[aur-general] Merge request

Please merge python-shiboken into shiboken. The shiboken package is older and shiboken is an application, not a library, so it as the proper naming scheme. Both packages provide the same software, and there are no particular differences in build flags. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera pgpcuMKjPvtTH.pgp

[aur-general] Merge request for [mingw-w64-qt5]

Hi, To follow the naming conventions of the qt5 packages in extra could someone please merge my mingw-w64-qt5 packages with ant32's mingw-w64-qt5 packages? old packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-qt5-qtbase/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-qt5-qtbase-static/ https:/

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request: tunet mytunet qtunet corsair

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:29 PM, GSC wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/mytunet/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/qtunet/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages/tunet/

Re: [aur-general] Delete request "python2-storm-git"

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Samed Beyribey wrote: > Hi, > > Could someone delete python2-storm-git package, please? It's causing > confusion with "python2-storm" > > Here's the link: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-storm-git/ > > > I've uploaded a new package named "python2-stor

[aur-general] Delete request "python2-storm-git"

Hi, Could someone delete python2-storm-git package, please? It's causing confusion with "python2-storm" Here's the link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-storm-git/ I've uploaded a new package named "python2-stormssh-git" -- Samed Beyribey

[aur-general] Delete Request: tunet mytunet qtunet corsair

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mytunet/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtunet/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tunet/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/corsair/ These are some obsolete authentication packages for university internal network authentication, are no longer usable.

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: reciteword-books and reciteword-dicts

Okay, thank you. On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:03 PM, hbdee.arch wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > The reciteword-{books,dicts} packages are unmaintained and broken. They > > build but don't package any files and haven't been updated since 2010.

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: reciteword-books and reciteword-dicts

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:03 PM, hbdee.arch wrote: > Hello, > > The reciteword-{books,dicts} packages are unmaintained and broken. They > build but don't package any files and haven't been updated since 2010. I > posted a comment to both packages with a link to working PKGBUILDS, but > there's be

[aur-general] Orphan request: reciteword-books and reciteword-dicts

Hello, The reciteword-{books,dicts} packages are unmaintained and broken. They build but don't package any files and haven't been updated since 2010. I posted a comment to both packages with a link to working PKGBUILDS, but there's been no reply from the maintainer, who appears to no longer be act

Re: [aur-general] [delete] xz-alpha

On Thursday, August 29, 2013 08:08:57 member graysky wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xz-alpha/ > > Xz-alpha v5.1.2 was tagged by upstream >13 mo ago. There is a more > up-to-date xz-git package. Plz delete this one. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: Th

[aur-general] [delete] xz-alpha

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xz-alpha/ Xz-alpha v5.1.2 was tagged by upstream >13 mo ago. There is a more up-to-date xz-git package. Plz delete this one.

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days