Re: [aur-general] CSDP and Mosek in AUR :-)

2013-09-21 Thread Ido Rosen
Hi, I just submitted two packages to AUR, these are my first packages so comments are welcome: coinor-csdp mosek (Note that mosek's "source" is dependent on the target architecture, so it only shows the 32 bit one on the AUR package website.) * CSDP is a C library for Semidefinite Prog

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: oss-hg

2013-09-21 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Sat 21 Sep 2013 at 16:14, Nowaker wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like oss-hg package removed from AUR. OSS does not use Mercurial > for development now, so the name is out of date. Besides, the > package didn't contain systemd units. Today I uploaded oss-git which > is almost a 1:1 copy of oss from [comm

Re: [aur-general] Merge mmat-git into minecraft-map-auto-trim-git

2013-09-21 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Fri 20 Sep 2013 at 13:33, Buce wrote: > Please merge > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mmat-git/ > > into > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minecraft-map-auto-trim-git/ > > as I believe the latter more accurately reflects the upstream project's > name. With no votes or comments to

[aur-general] Removal request: oss-hg

2013-09-21 Thread Nowaker
Hi, I'd like oss-hg package removed from AUR. OSS does not use Mercurial for development now, so the name is out of date. Besides, the package didn't contain systemd units. Today I uploaded oss-git which is almost a 1:1 copy of oss from [community]. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost

Re: [aur-general] RFC: freecad-git

2013-09-21 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > > But not needed here. If oce and oce-git provide=(opencascade), > freecad-git could simply depends=(opencascade). Good point, I thought oce and opencascade are two completely different projects. However, after more careful reading I would s

Re: [aur-general] RFC: freecad-git

2013-09-21 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:33:47AM +, Xyne wrote: > Hi, > > Would anyone care to comment on this PKGBUILD? > > AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fr/freecad-git/PKGBUILD > Pastebin copy: http://pastebin.com/q3ARNgJ6 > > Is this an acceptable clever workaround or an abomination that shou

Re: [aur-general] RFC: freecad-git

2013-09-21 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Xyne wrote: > Hi, > > Would anyone care to comment on this PKGBUILD? > > AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fr/freecad-git/PKGBUILD > Pastebin copy: http://pastebin.com/q3ARNgJ6 > > Is this an acceptable clever workaround or an abomination that should be > p

Re: [aur-general] RFC: freecad-git

2013-09-21 Thread Jesse Juhani Jaara
A non-Tu opinion: it is a real abomination. A complete nuking might be a good idea, as it seems it would take less time to rewrite it from scrach than to simply clean it up.

[aur-general] RFC: freecad-git

2013-09-21 Thread Xyne
Hi, Would anyone care to comment on this PKGBUILD? AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fr/freecad-git/PKGBUILD Pastebin copy: http://pastebin.com/q3ARNgJ6 Is this an acceptable clever workaround or an abomination that should be purged with fire? Regards, Xyne p.s. OR statements and other

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-09-21 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days