On Monday 30 September 2013 01:28:57 Xyne wrote:
> >Ouch. I will fix it soon.
>
> Thanks!
So, pkgbuilds were fixed.
> Nevertheless, code that fails in valid and foreseeable user cases is bad,
> even if those cases are closer to the edge.
I understand this. And that's why I tried to correct P
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:50 AM, MayKiller
wrote:
> numix-utouch-icon-theme-daily is different with
> numix-utouch-icon-theme-bzr.
>
> here is PKGBUILD of numix-utouch-icon-theme-daily.
> please install these package and check it different or not.
>
I don't need to install it to tell that the dai
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Nowaker wrote:
>> acpi_call-git's PKGBUILD [1] is currently broken, as it uses a patch
>> that is not necessary for long time now. This was commented, but the
>> maintainer doesn't fixed nor replied about. Please disown it, so I can
>> fix it.
>
>
> It looks like t
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 29 packages missing signoffs
* 6 packages older than 14 days
numix-utouch-icon-theme-daily is different with
numix-utouch-icon-theme-bzr.
here is PKGBUILD of numix-utouch-icon-theme-daily.
please install these package and check it different or not.
# Maintainer: MayKiller
pkgname=numix-utouch-icon-theme-daily
pkgver=0.4_0_78
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Touch styl
