=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 4 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
Hi,
The proposal to augment package libisoburn is in the
bug tracker since a month.
(See https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/36931 )
I am thankful towards the package maintainer of libisoburn
for keeping it up to date. So i refrain from bothering him
more.
Now what to do about the two outdated and
Dear TUs,
please rename the package [ kdeplasma-addons-applets-miniweb ] to
[ kdeplasma-applets-miniweb ] as this is required by Arch's KDE SC
guidelines:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/KDE_Package_Guidelines#Plasma_widgets
Best regards.
--
/Martin
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Fernando Gilberto da Silva
fire...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
Finally I adopted eclipse-38 and eclipse-juno(Which is actually 3.8)
and uploaded package eclipse3.8.
Could someone do me a favour, merge the following
eclipse-382
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Levente Polyak
a...@leventepolyak.net wrote:
Hello all,
please merge smali2 [1] into smali [2]
smali was marked out-of-date some time ago and not maintained, in the
meanwhile Fernando (Firef0x) submitted smali2 with a recent version.
As smali got disowned
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Martín Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us
wrote:
Dear TUs,
please rename the package [ kdeplasma-addons-applets-miniweb ] to
[ kdeplasma-applets-miniweb ] as this is required by Arch's KDE SC
guidelines:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Daniele Formichelli
daniele.formiche...@gmail.com wrote:
dkms-rpi-rtl8188eu-git can be deleted (see the comments)
Deleted, please include a link to the AUR page next time.
--
Maxime
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason St. John jstj...@purdue.edu
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John
jstj...@purdue.edu wrote:
On
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Xorg xorgbrea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I want to remove many packages, if it is possible.
First, the group lib32-gnustep-clang-svn:
lib32-gnustep-base-clang-svn
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gnustep-base-clang-svn/
lib32-gnustep-corebase-clang-svn
Dear Maxime, thanks for your quick reply :)
I already submitted the two new packages I needed to rename and voted them,
please remove:
kdeplasma-addons-applets-miniweb located here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-addons-applets-miniweb/
kdeplasma-addons-applets-gtaskslocated
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Martín Cigorraga m...@archlinux.us
wrote:
Dear Maxime, thanks for your quick reply :)
I already submitted the two new packages I needed to rename and voted
them,
please remove:
kdeplasma-addons-applets-miniweb located here:
Hi
please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-socket/ because now is
included in [community]
greetings
On 21 October 2013 18:16, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-socket/ because now is
included in [community]
Removed, thanks.
I'm the creator mainter for python-sleekxmpp-git :
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sleekxmpp-git/
And I think it should be merged with python-sleekxmpp-devel :
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sleekxmpp-devel/
Not sure why I created a new package, as the -devel, despite
Monodevelop now offers the MonoGame Project addin directly on their site[1]
and in their addin manager.
The package monodevelop-monogame-addin-git[2] is therefore useless.
[1] http://addins.monodevelop.com/Project/Index/47
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/monodevelop-monogame-addin-git/
please merge r-mvtnorm [0] into r-cran-mvtnorm [1], as the latter
follows the common naming scheme and is up to date.
thanks
[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/r-mvtnorm/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/r-cran-mvtnorm/
Breaking away from an IRC convo from this morning; has support for
remote sums been considered for pacman?
It's currently possible to do this for .sig files (through the source
array), but not available for simple sha/md5 hashes. This would let
packagers do something like:
From: adys...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 01:56:16 +0100
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: [aur-general] Support for remote sums in PKGBUILDs
Breaking away from an IRC convo from this morning; has support for
remote sums been considered for
s/possible/possibly/
s/checksum in there/checksum in the PKGBUILD as usual/
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Ido Rosen i...@kernel.org wrote:
- Do PKGBUILDs support signing the PKGBUILD and verifying that signature?
(This seems like a good feature for yaourt or possible makepkg if it isn't
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 22:19:32 -0400
From: i...@kernel.org
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Support for remote sums in PKGBUILDs
- Do PKGBUILDs support signing the PKGBUILD and verifying that signature?
(This seems like a
It'd be nice to have as an option - especially since the key fingerprint is
easy to look up on the AUR website. Then tools like yaourt or makepkg can
alert you when the keyID of the sig, for example, differs from the one that
signed the currently installed version during an upgrade, as a means of
(Just an additional implementation detail, but this would mean the verified
keyID/fingerprint on the PKGBUILD that generated the pkg gets included in
the pkg somehow, not that the pkg needs to be signed by the same key as the
PKGBUILD was.)
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Ido Rosen
This idea is a little bit more impractical, but: Handoff could be done
cryptographically as well - a signed PKGBUILD could carry a source file
that has a transfer-of-maintainership signature (e.g. a clearsigned message
with the date and name of the package/base) by the old key signing the new
23 matches
Mail list logo
