On Tuesday 26 November 2013 19:05:25 Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> Please disown ctwm-git:
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ctwm-git
>
> Out of date. Not updated since first submitted.
> Maintainer does not respond to direct email.
>
> I have updated PKGBUILD ready to go.
Hm. Its mainta
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 04:02:44 sir_luc...@bridgelinux.pl wrote:
> Hi
>
> please remove this package -
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lucjan/ - I added it by mistake
Removed, thanks
--
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.
e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407
Hi
please remove this package - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lucjan/
- I added it by mistake
Regards,
Piotr 'sir_lucjan' Gorski
--
sir_luc...@bridgelinux.pl
On 26/11/2013 16:00, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2,
> kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been updated in a very, very long time.
>
> docker (https://www.docker.io/) on the other hand, is a widely used
> and current container solution. As of 0.7
Please disown ctwm-git:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ctwm-git
Out of date. Not updated since first submitted.
Maintainer does not respond to direct email.
I have updated PKGBUILD ready to go.
--brian
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Lieven Moors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if it would be ok to let my package
> (non-daw-git) depend on the ntk-git package instead of
> ntk. The package ntk is not yet available in AUR, but
> ntk-git is. I think technically, ntk-git should provide
> ntk, and n
On 27 November 2013 04:43, Lieven Moors wrote:
> I think technically, ntk-git should provide
> ntk, and non-daw-git should depend on some git-release
> of ntk.
You can depend on ntk-git, but a better approach is to have ntk-git
provide ntk, and depend on that -- if devel functionality of ntk is
n
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be ok to let my package
(non-daw-git) depend on the ntk-git package instead of
ntk. The package ntk is not yet available in AUR, but
ntk-git is. I think technically, ntk-git should provide
ntk, and non-daw-git should depend on some git-release
of ntk. The downside f
Could someone please disown mingw-w64-bin [1].
Since Arch Linux has a working mingw-w64 toolchain [2] now it might be
better to delete it?
I emailed the maintainer and only received "Delivery to the following
recipient failed permanently"
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-bin/
[2] h
I really don't care either way, but (a) lxc-docker is more descriptive of
what docker actually is than docker-io; and (b) the Docker
website/installation documentation for ArchLinux already points to
lxc-docker and lxc-docker-git... It's not worth changing names unless it's
for plain old "docker".
FWIW, Red Hat calls their package docker-io. If renaming the old
system tray app isn't an option, then perhaps docker-io is an option.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2,
> kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been up
On 11/26/13, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quiviewer/ - Source gone
Fixed. Please attempt at least a cursory search for sources before
requesting deletion.
-Kyle
http://kmkeen.com
Hi, I'm the maintainer of lxc-docker and lxc-docker-git in AUR. I'd love
to rename it to docker! The current extra/docker can be renamed to
docker-tray or something similar?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for ope
extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2,
kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been updated in a very, very long time.
docker (https://www.docker.io/) on the other hand, is a widely used
and current container solution. As of 0.7, it's now available on all
distributions (previously w
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openssh-lpk/ - outdated, patch not
needed anymore
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/v8-static/ - bad name, unneeded, out of date
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/postgresql84/ &
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/postgresql84-libs/ - Same as qt46;
very out of d
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Dustin Falgout
wrote:
Hi,
The packages kcm-grub2[1] and kcm-grub2-git[2] are both orphans and
there doesn't look to be any active development on the program. The
PKGBUILD's need updating to compile properly. There is an alternative
available in the AUR th
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Jerome Leclanche
wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qsplashy-arch-svn/ - source dead
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-globalmenu/ - extremely old
patched gtk, orphan, functionality upstreamed
Gone.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imlib2-
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
18 matches
Mail list logo