Re: [aur-general] Disown request: ctwm-git

2013-11-26 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Tuesday 26 November 2013 19:05:25 Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Please disown ctwm-git: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ctwm-git > > Out of date. Not updated since first submitted. > Maintainer does not respond to direct email. > > I have updated PKGBUILD ready to go. Hm. Its mainta

Re: [aur-general] delete request

2013-11-26 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 04:02:44 sir_luc...@bridgelinux.pl wrote: > Hi > > please remove this package - > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lucjan/ - I added it by mistake Removed, thanks -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407

[aur-general] delete request

2013-11-26 Thread sir_luc...@bridgelinux.pl
Hi please remove this package - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lucjan/ - I added it by mistake Regards, Piotr 'sir_lucjan' Gorski -- sir_luc...@bridgelinux.pl

Re: [aur-general] docker v. docker

2013-11-26 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On 26/11/2013 16:00, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2, > kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been updated in a very, very long time. > > docker (https://www.docker.io/) on the other hand, is a widely used > and current container solution. As of 0.7

[aur-general] Disown request: ctwm-git

2013-11-26 Thread Brian F. G. Bidulock
Please disown ctwm-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ctwm-git Out of date. Not updated since first submitted. Maintainer does not respond to direct email. I have updated PKGBUILD ready to go. --brian

Re: [aur-general] question about git package as a dependency

2013-11-26 Thread Gabriel B. Casella
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Lieven Moors wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if it would be ok to let my package > (non-daw-git) depend on the ntk-git package instead of > ntk. The package ntk is not yet available in AUR, but > ntk-git is. I think technically, ntk-git should provide > ntk, and n

Re: [aur-general] question about git package as a dependency

2013-11-26 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 27 November 2013 04:43, Lieven Moors wrote: > I think technically, ntk-git should provide > ntk, and non-daw-git should depend on some git-release > of ntk. You can depend on ntk-git, but a better approach is to have ntk-git provide ntk, and depend on that -- if devel functionality of ntk is n

[aur-general] question about git package as a dependency

2013-11-26 Thread Lieven Moors
Hi, I was wondering if it would be ok to let my package (non-daw-git) depend on the ntk-git package instead of ntk. The package ntk is not yet available in AUR, but ntk-git is. I think technically, ntk-git should provide ntk, and non-daw-git should depend on some git-release of ntk. The downside f

[aur-general] Disown mingw-w64-bin

2013-11-26 Thread Philip A Reimer
Could someone please disown mingw-w64-bin [1]. Since Arch Linux has a working mingw-w64 toolchain [2] now it might be better to delete it? I emailed the maintainer and only received "Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently" [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-bin/ [2] h

Re: [aur-general] docker v. docker

2013-11-26 Thread Ido Rosen
I really don't care either way, but (a) lxc-docker is more descriptive of what docker actually is than docker-io; and (b) the Docker website/installation documentation for ArchLinux already points to lxc-docker and lxc-docker-git... It's not worth changing names unless it's for plain old "docker".

Re: [aur-general] docker v. docker

2013-11-26 Thread Joseph Hall
FWIW, Red Hat calls their package docker-io. If renaming the old system tray app isn't an option, then perhaps docker-io is an option. On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2, > kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been up

Re: [aur-general] More delete requests

2013-11-26 Thread keenerd
On 11/26/13, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quiviewer/ - Source gone Fixed. Please attempt at least a cursory search for sources before requesting deletion. -Kyle http://kmkeen.com

Re: [aur-general] docker v. docker

2013-11-26 Thread Ido Rosen
Hi, I'm the maintainer of lxc-docker and lxc-docker-git in AUR. I'd love to rename it to docker! The current extra/docker can be renamed to docker-tray or something similar? On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for ope

[aur-general] docker v. docker

2013-11-26 Thread Jerome Leclanche
extra/docker is currently a very old system tray app for openbox2, kde3 and gnome2. It hasn't been updated in a very, very long time. docker (https://www.docker.io/) on the other hand, is a widely used and current container solution. As of 0.7, it's now available on all distributions (previously w

[aur-general] More delete requests

2013-11-26 Thread Jerome Leclanche
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openssh-lpk/ - outdated, patch not needed anymore https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/v8-static/ - bad name, unneeded, out of date https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/postgresql84/ & https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/postgresql84-libs/ - Same as qt46; very out of d

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2013-11-26 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Dustin Falgout wrote: Hi, The packages kcm-grub2[1] and kcm-grub2-git[2] are both orphans and there doesn't look to be any active development on the program. The PKGBUILD's need updating to compile properly. There is an alternative available in the AUR th

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests

2013-11-26 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qsplashy-arch-svn/ - source dead https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-globalmenu/ - extremely old patched gtk, orphan, functionality upstreamed Gone. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imlib2-

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-11-26 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days