Hi,
I think my packages otf-source-sans-pro [1] and ttf-source-sans-pro
[2] could be deleted as is is present now in the [extra] repo [3].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/otf-source-sans-pro/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-source-sans-pro/
[3] https://www.archlinux.org/packages
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 8 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 17 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Curtis Shimamoto
wrote:
> This is a module that is meant for Realtek RTS5229 Pcie SDCard readers.
> The functionality was mainlined around 3.8 with the rtsx-pci module (I
> know because my machine uses this).
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rts5229
> https://
Hi,
Removed, thanks.
--
Sincerely,
Alexander Rødseth
xyproto / TU
rt-tests-git is no longer needed as when there are changes a new
tarball is published and covered by the rt-tests buildscript. It was
only created when kernel.org had been hacked and there was a problem
getting the tarballs.
No need to merge into rt-tests.
Thanks in advance,
--
Joakim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I've made a package for sic. This is my first package. I've tested it
and I haven't noticed any issues. Please review it in case I've missed
something.
sic: http://tools.suckless.org/sic
Packag
On 2 December 2013 00:31, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> rt-tests-git is no longer needed as when there are changes a new
> tarball is published and covered by the rt-tests buildscript. It was
> only created when kernel.org had been hacked and there was a problem
> getting the tarballs.
>
> No need to
> Please review it in case I've missed something.
You can drop the `pkgdir= #TODO` line completely. makepkg defines $pkgdir
for you. [1]
namcap emits several warnings. Run `namcap sic-1.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz` to
see them.
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/pacman/PKGBUILD.5.html#_build_function.
--J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 02:43:13PM -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> > Please review it in case I've missed something.
>
> You can drop the `pkgdir= #TODO` line completely. makepkg defines $pkgdir
> for you. [1]
>
> namcap emits several warnings. Run `n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 02:43:13PM -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> > Please review it in case I've missed something.
>
> You can drop the `pkgdir= #TODO` line completely. makepkg defines $pkgdir
> for you. [1]
>
> namcap emits several warnings. Run `n
> I've removed the pkgdir line, fixed the namcap warnings,
Great!
> and reuploaded the package now.
Is the new .tar.gz file available at the same location? [1] I'm still
getting the exact same set of files.
> Thanks for your help,
Thank *you* for taking the time to email this list.
> is there an
On Sunday 01 December 2013 22:17:28 nyuszika7h wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> > Is the new .tar.gz file available at the same location? [1] I'm still
> > getting the exact same set of files.
>
> I forgot to rebuild the source tarball. I've fixed that now.
Hi,
Can I please get unrar4[1] removed? Unrar5 is in extra already; v4 was kept
until pyunrar2 was updated to support the new version, which it was the
other day.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/unrar4/
Regards,
Justin Dray
E: jus...@dray.be
M: 0433348284
13 matches
Mail list logo
