Re: [aur-general] Merge request: sdlpal-->sdlpal-git

2013-12-11 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:44 AM, 蒲肖肖 wrote: > Hi, > > Please merge my package sdlpal[1] into sdlpal-git[2]. The upsteam > now use git to manage source code. > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sdlpal/ > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sdlpal-git/ > > > Thanks, > Shaw > Merged, th

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2013-12-11 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Sam S.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > I don't understand why makepkg -S > doesn't include the .PKGINFO file from makepkg (and subsequently the > AUR would use that if present instead of the grep system which fails > as soon as variables/expansions are involved which is every

Re: [aur-general] TU application - Sponsored by Balló György

2013-12-11 Thread Martin Wimpress
Hi, Every package I maintain has been updated today taking into to account the feedback that has been provided in this discussion and the feedback Balló has sent to me directly. On Tue, 2013-12-10 at 23:18 +, Martin Wimpress wrote: > > Your PKGBUILDs look good overall but I noticed two thing

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Jerome Leclanche
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Sam S. wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > >> I don't understand why makepkg -S >> doesn't include the .PKGINFO file from makepkg (and subsequently the >> AUR would use that if present instead of the grep system which fails >> as so

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 06:12:59PM +, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Sam S. wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > > > >> I don't understand why makepkg -S > >> doesn't include the .PKGINFO file from makepkg (and subsequently the > >>

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Jerome Leclanche
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 06:12:59PM +, Jerome Leclanche wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Sam S. wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Jerome Leclanche >> > wrote: >> > >> >> I don't understand why makepkg -S >> >> doesn'

Re: [aur-general] Possible to switch the votes/comments for two packages?

2013-12-11 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 8 December 2013 21:07, member graysky wrote: > On Sunday, December 8, 2013, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: >> >> >> 1. Backup mprime >> 2. Merge mprime into mprime-bin >> 3. Delete non-relevant comments from mprime-bin >> 4. Reupload mprime from backup >> >> This should work to retain mprime-bin's da

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 08:21:44PM +, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 06:12:59PM +, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Sam S. wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Jerome Leclanc

Re: [aur-general] Possible to switch the votes/comments for two packages?

2013-12-11 Thread member graysky
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > On 8 December 2013 21:07, member graysky wrote: >> On Sunday, December 8, 2013, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: >>> >>> >>> 1. Backup mprime >>> 2. Merge mprime into mprime-bin >>> 3. Delete non-relevant comments from mprime-bin >>> 4. Reupload

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Justin Dray
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 08:21:44PM +, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 06:12:59PM +, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Sam S.

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Dave Reisner
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 08:47:49AM +1000, Justin Dray wrote: > What is to stop us using both? I don't think anyone has said we should stop > parsing the PKGBUILD for the AUR and exclusively parse a .PKGINFO instead. We should stop parsing the PKGBUILD for the AUR and exclusively parse a .SRCINFO i

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Jerome Leclanche
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 08:21:44PM +, Jerome Leclanche wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Dave Reisner wrote: >> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 06:12:59PM +, Jerome Leclanche wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Sam S. wr

[aur-general] Disown a number of ruby-* packages

2013-12-11 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi I have a dream to make rails from packages work on Arch again. Currently rails and many of its dependencies are out-of-date with broken dependencies. I would like to get ownership on many of the 'kidoz' user ruby-* packages. I emailed kidoz 10 days ago about transferring his out-of-date (or ev

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Xyne
On 2013-12-11 22:57 + Jerome Leclanche wrote: >These are all issues that can easily be fixed. Sources/checksums can >be added, extra architectures can be generated, and split packages can >be described in sections. (.conf aka .ini file format would be a >perfect fit here and would be forwards-

Re: [aur-general] 'provides' info in AUR

2013-12-11 Thread Xyne
On 2013-12-12 01:39 + Xyne wrote: >My response is not directly at you in particular. I'm reply to the thread as a >whole. *directed *replying etc. Apparently I'm dysgraphic. :/