On Sunday, December 15, 2013 13:28:40 Lester B wrote:
> Good day!
>
> Please orphan the package xapian-omega[1]. I had asked the maintainer
> and replied that I am free to adopt it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xapian-omega/
>
> Sincerely,
> Lestb
Disowned, thanks.
R
Good day!
Please orphan the package xapian-omega[1]. I had asked the maintainer
and replied that I am free to adopt it.
Thanks!
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xapian-omega/
Sincerely,
Lestb
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 01:52:23 Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Does not support python 3. Package exists at python2-wikitools.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-wikitools/
>
> J. Leclanche
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
Hi guys,
Please delete the following packages owned by me:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-mpi-3/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gromacs-407/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tcl84/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tk84/
Both gromacs packages were needed at the lab i used to w
Does not support python 3. Package exists at python2-wikitools.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-wikitools/
J. Leclanche
> For the last one, I think we can ignore the prefix as we already did for
> python packages (like python-dateutil and python2-memcached, they both
have a
> "python-" prefix on pypi index). But... as you wish :)
I also interpret those naming rules with a grain of salt. For example, the
vim-a [1] a
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 4 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 6 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
