=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 61 packages missing signoffs
* 50 packages older than 14
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 at 02:36:03, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
I don't fully understand the logic in currently having an .AURINFO
instead of defining the .SRCINFO format right now and have a tool
generating those for the time being (since it'll likely be the same
format as .PKGINFO). It can go in
It may sound like two dumb or unrelated ideas, but I figure they would
become relevant to the discussion at one point anyway. So, let's look
at the question we're avoiding all the time: What is the problem with
PKGBUILDs? That it's not limited to a subset of sh?
There seem to be regularly efforts
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 at 14:24:58, Martti Kühne wrote:
It may sound like two dumb or unrelated ideas, but I figure they would
become relevant to the discussion at one point anyway. So, let's look
at the question we're avoiding all the time: What is the problem with
PKGBUILDs? That it's not
Hello,
I would like to remove a package that I recently submitted to AUR (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fleche/ ). I realized (as pointed out by an
user) that I should have named it fleche-themes, instead of just fleche. I
would like to fix this mistake. It would be great if someone
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Mahmud Ridwan m...@hjr265.me wrote:
Hello,
I would like to remove a package that I recently submitted to AUR (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fleche/ ). I realized (as pointed out
by an user) that I should have named it fleche-themes, instead of just
Thanks. I have created an issue on GitHub. Waiting for the author's response.
Will update the PKGBUILDs as soon as I get one.
From: aluc...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:25:30 +0100
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Remove package from AUR
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014
I accidentally uploaded a package with the incorrect pkgname - it was
labeled ds4drv when it should have been ds4drv-git. I have already uploaded
it again after correcting my error, is it possible to get the other one
removed to prevent confusion?
On Monday, January 13, 2014 09:58:04 Vash63 wrote:
I accidentally uploaded a package with the incorrect pkgname - it was
labeled ds4drv when it should have been ds4drv-git. I have already uploaded
it again after correcting my error, is it possible to get the other one
removed to prevent
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
[...]
So, you're basically evaluating all PKGBUILD variables on the client
side, then print them into a file called PKGBUILD.gen? That's exactly
what .AURINFO is, except it has another file name.
Except in my
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Fleischer
archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
[...]
So, you're basically evaluating all PKGBUILD variables on the client
side, then print them into a file called PKGBUILD.gen? That's
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] You have a full egg with .AURINFO
at least, in an ideal world, you *could*, and probably *should* have
an AUR-normalized PKGBUILD instead of plethoras of more files that all
do all-too similar things for all-too
Hi,
Please remove the following orphan package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua51-socket-prosody
This is an old version not required anymore, and a newer version is in
community:
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/lua51-socket/
--
Timothée Ravier
The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 2.3.1. It
includes fixes to the typeahead plugin. For a short list of changes,
read [1].
Please report any issues to the AUR bug tracker [2].
[1] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2014-January/002614.html
[2]
On Monday, January 13, 2014 20:02:29 Timothée Ravier wrote:
Hi,
Please remove the following orphan package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua51-socket-prosody
This is an old version not required anymore, and a newer version is in
community:
Hello,
Please delete ruby-cucumber[1] and ruby-cucumber-chef[2]
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-cucumber/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-cucumber-chef/
--
Regards,
Alfredo Palhares
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 03:04:53 Alfredo Palhares wrote:
Hello,
Please delete ruby-cucumber[1] and ruby-cucumber-chef[2]
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-cucumber/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-cucumber-chef/
Both removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
17 matches
Mail list logo