[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-01-13 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 61 packages missing signoffs * 50 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] Promoting use of .AURINFO

2014-01-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 at 02:36:03, Jerome Leclanche wrote: I don't fully understand the logic in currently having an .AURINFO instead of defining the .SRCINFO format right now and have a tool generating those for the time being (since it'll likely be the same format as .PKGINFO). It can go in

Re: [aur-general] Promoting use of .AURINFO

2014-01-13 Thread Martti Kühne
It may sound like two dumb or unrelated ideas, but I figure they would become relevant to the discussion at one point anyway. So, let's look at the question we're avoiding all the time: What is the problem with PKGBUILDs? That it's not limited to a subset of sh? There seem to be regularly efforts

Re: [aur-general] Promoting use of .AURINFO

2014-01-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 at 14:24:58, Martti Kühne wrote: It may sound like two dumb or unrelated ideas, but I figure they would become relevant to the discussion at one point anyway. So, let's look at the question we're avoiding all the time: What is the problem with PKGBUILDs? That it's not

[aur-general] Remove package from AUR

2014-01-13 Thread Mahmud Ridwan
Hello, I would like to remove a package that I recently submitted to AUR ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fleche/ ). I realized (as pointed out by an user) that I should have named it fleche-themes, instead of just fleche. I would like to fix this mistake. It would be great if someone

Re: [aur-general] Remove package from AUR

2014-01-13 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Mahmud Ridwan m...@hjr265.me wrote: Hello, I would like to remove a package that I recently submitted to AUR ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fleche/ ). I realized (as pointed out by an user) that I should have named it fleche-themes, instead of just

Re: [aur-general] Remove package from AUR

2014-01-13 Thread Mahmud Ridwan
Thanks. I have created an issue on GitHub. Waiting for the author's response. Will update the PKGBUILDs as soon as I get one. From: aluc...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:25:30 +0100 To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] Remove package from AUR On Mon, Jan 13, 2014

[aur-general] Package removal request - ds4drv

2014-01-13 Thread Vash63
I accidentally uploaded a package with the incorrect pkgname - it was labeled ds4drv when it should have been ds4drv-git. I have already uploaded it again after correcting my error, is it possible to get the other one removed to prevent confusion?

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request - ds4drv

2014-01-13 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, January 13, 2014 09:58:04 Vash63 wrote: I accidentally uploaded a package with the incorrect pkgname - it was labeled ds4drv when it should have been ds4drv-git. I have already uploaded it again after correcting my error, is it possible to get the other one removed to prevent

Re: [aur-general] Promoting use of .AURINFO

2014-01-13 Thread Martti Kühne
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: [...] So, you're basically evaluating all PKGBUILD variables on the client side, then print them into a file called PKGBUILD.gen? That's exactly what .AURINFO is, except it has another file name. Except in my

Re: [aur-general] Promoting use of .AURINFO

2014-01-13 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: [...] So, you're basically evaluating all PKGBUILD variables on the client side, then print them into a file called PKGBUILD.gen? That's

Re: [aur-general] Promoting use of .AURINFO

2014-01-13 Thread Martti Kühne
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Martti Kühne mysat...@gmail.com wrote: [...] You have a full egg with .AURINFO at least, in an ideal world, you *could*, and probably *should* have an AUR-normalized PKGBUILD instead of plethoras of more files that all do all-too similar things for all-too

[aur-general] Package removal request - lua51-socket-prosody

2014-01-13 Thread Timothée Ravier
Hi, Please remove the following orphan package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua51-socket-prosody This is an old version not required anymore, and a newer version is in community: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/lua51-socket/ -- Timothée Ravier

[aur-general] AUR upgraded to 2.3.1

2014-01-13 Thread Lukas Fleischer
The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 2.3.1. It includes fixes to the typeahead plugin. For a short list of changes, read [1]. Please report any issues to the AUR bug tracker [2]. [1] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2014-January/002614.html [2]

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request - lua51-socket-prosody

2014-01-13 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, January 13, 2014 20:02:29 Timothée Ravier wrote: Hi, Please remove the following orphan package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua51-socket-prosody This is an old version not required anymore, and a newer version is in community:

[aur-general] Delete ruby-cubumber and ruby-cucumber-chef

2014-01-13 Thread Alfredo Palhares
Hello, Please delete ruby-cucumber[1] and ruby-cucumber-chef[2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-cucumber/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-cucumber-chef/ -- Regards, Alfredo Palhares

Re: [aur-general] Delete ruby-cubumber and ruby-cucumber-chef

2014-01-13 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 03:04:53 Alfredo Palhares wrote: Hello, Please delete ruby-cucumber[1] and ruby-cucumber-chef[2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-cucumber/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-cucumber-chef/ Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan