On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> **DELETE**
>
> Patch is upstream, commit 6a8aabd3c132188ee8e0e82ef4aba09f782cbe96
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qemu-omap/
>
> Echievements is dead. It doesn't work with E18 (currently in [extra]) and
> doesn't even build with E19 (-gi
Hello,
I pushed this one by mistake:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libftdi1/
Could someone delete it ?
While at it, these ones are to be removed too:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openturns-doc/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openturns-svm/
-xan
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:46 AM, xantares 09 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I pushed this one by mistake:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libftdi1/
> Could someone delete it ?
>
> While at it, these ones are to be removed too:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openturns-doc/
> https://au
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 34 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 3 fully signed off packages
* 35 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 day
Hi,
the package omnetpp (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/omnetpp) is flagged
as out of date since 13th, April 2012. Moreover the provided email
jsopena.archli...@free.fr is not valid. Can you orphan that packages?
Regards,
Daniele
Hi,
I noticed recently that the wyrd-bzr package wasn't picking up the
current repository. I submitted a patch for the PKGBUILD in the
comments, but the maintainer hasn't responded. (I can't see any activity
from them since 2011.)
I've emailed the maintainer, but not received a response. I'd be h
On 24/01/14 11:07, Joss Wright wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed recently that the wyrd-bzr package wasn't picking up the
> current repository. I submitted a patch for the PKGBUILD in the
> comments, but the maintainer hasn't responded. (I can't see any activity
> from them since 2011.)
>
> I've emailed
On 24/01/14 10:07, Daniele Formichelli wrote:
> Hi,
> the package omnetpp (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/omnetpp) is flagged
> as out of date since 13th, April 2012. Moreover the provided email
> jsopena.archli...@free.fr is not valid. Can you orphan that packages?
>
> Regards,
> Daniele
>
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python32-cairo/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python32-gobject/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python31-cairo/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python31-gobject/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python26-cairo/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyth
Hallo,
please remove the package dktools-gui. GUI components for dktools are
included in the dktools package since version 3.0, so the old
dktools-gui package is obsolete. I am the owner of the package.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dktools-gui
Thanks,
Ansgar
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Ansgar Taflinski wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> please remove the package dktools-gui. GUI components for dktools are
> included in the dktools package since version 3.0, so the old
> dktools-gui package is obsolete. I am the owner of the package.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.o
Am 22.01.2014 23:56, schrieb Balló György:
[...]
>2014/1/22 Xyne :
>> I don't want to discourage you from further contribution but I do not think
>> that you are ready to be a TU. You should take some time to address the
>> issues
>> raised in this thread and then spend at least a few more months
On 25 January 2014 02:53, carstene1ns wrote:
> closing words:
> I know this reads in parts like a rant, but it is just to show you that
> also current TUs are not better in some aspects.
> Again it is not meant to blame speps (but seriously, just orphan some
> packages! :P) or Dragonlord. Just my
On 01/04/14 10:03, Anton Leontiev wrote:
Hi,
I'm maintainer of 'perl-extutils-f77' package [1]. After 'unneeded'
static libraries were removed from 'gcc-fortran' [2] my package has
stopped passing 'check' stage. The reason is that 'perl-extutils-f77'
searches exclusively static libraries. Please
Hi,
Development version of pepper flash now moved to chromium-pepper-flash-dev
package, so I am moving stable version from chromium-pepper-flash-stable
to chromium-pepper-flash to match package name guidelines better.
So, can you please merge
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-pepper-fla
Hey,
Please merge archipel-agent-nightly [1] into archipel-agent-git. [2]
Nightly version is just a dump of git repo, so I decided to build it
directly from git. Thanks.
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archipel-agent-nightly/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archipel-agent-git/
> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:53:19 +0100
> From: a...@carsten-teibes.de
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU application, sponsored by Lukas Fleischer
>
> Am 22.01.2014 23:56, schrieb Balló György:
> [...]
>>2014/1/22 Xyne :
>>> I d
On Friday 24 January 2014 18:59:24 Aliaksandr Stelmachonak wrote:
> Development version of pepper flash now moved to chromium-pepper-flash-dev
> package, so I am moving stable version from chromium-pepper-flash-stable
> to chromium-pepper-flash to match package name guidelines better.
>
> So, can
18 matches
Mail list logo
