Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-module-*] Removal request

2014-02-05 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 14:29:14 tuftedoce...@fastmail.fm wrote: > Oops, forgot one more: openurl[1]. It duplicate functionality that > urlopen-hg already provides > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014, at 11:29 AM, tuftedoce...@fastmail.fm wrote: > > Here's the laundry list of mcabber-modules that can be

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request: mingw-w64-sqlite

2014-02-05 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 14:18:50 Philip A Reimer wrote: > Could a TU please delete mingw-w64-sqlite > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-sqlite . I'll try to > contact the maintainer of the sqlite package in extra and see what his > plans are. Removed, thank you. -- С уважением, Е

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - bitcoind

2014-02-05 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 23:40:14 WorMzy Tykashi wrote: > Please remove bitcoind [1], it is provided by community/bitcoin-daemon. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc D

[aur-general] Removal request - bitcoind

2014-02-05 Thread WorMzy Tykashi
Hi, Please remove bitcoind [1], it is provided by community/bitcoin-daemon. Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoind/

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-module-*] Removal request

2014-02-05 Thread tuftedocelot
Oops, forgot one more: openurl[1]. It duplicate functionality that urlopen-hg already provides [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mcabber-module-openurl/ On Wed, Feb 5, 2014, at 11:29 AM, tuftedoce...@fastmail.fm wrote: > Here's the laundry list of mcabber-modules that can be removed from the

[aur-general] Delete Request: mingw-w64-sqlite

2014-02-05 Thread Philip A Reimer
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Philip A Reimer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Daniel Micay wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Philip A Reimer wrote: >> > Hi >> > Please merge. I renamed the package to match the name of sqlite in extra. >> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packa

[aur-general] [mcabber-module-*] Removal request

2014-02-05 Thread tuftedocelot
Here's the laundry list of mcabber-modules that can be removed from the AUR for reasons given below. The thread here[1] is the one that started this all and I'm marking it here so the history is linked. [2] activity-hg: functionality is present in pep-hg and the repo no longer exists [3] beep-git:

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-05 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:57:32PM +0100, carstene1ns wrote: > Am 31.01.2014 14:42, schrieb Dave Reisner: > > On Jan 31, 2014 7:17 AM, "Lukas Fleischer" wrote: > [...] > >> Side effects: > >> > >> * The ~2000 packages maintained by these users will be orphaned. > > > > Can we get a list of these

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-05 Thread carstene1ns
Am 31.01.2014 14:42, schrieb Dave Reisner: > On Jan 31, 2014 7:17 AM, "Lukas Fleischer" wrote: [...] >> Side effects: >> >> * The ~2000 packages maintained by these users will be orphaned. > > Can we get a list of these packages?[...] As nobody with the power to do sql-fu on the AUR server creat

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread tuftedocelot
Actually, I do have another concern. The package mcabber-libotr4[1] is now superfluous. Under nixtrian, the mcabber-hg package did not enable libotr4 even though upstream has it in the code. My update to the PKGBUILD now adds libotr4 support by default (this follows the lead from mcabber in communi

Re: [aur-general] Duplicate packages

2014-02-05 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Fri 31 Jan 2014 at 22:35, Allen Li wrote: > I just noticed that there are three packages for The Dark Mod game in > the AUR: > > darkmod, v2.00-1, maintainer caemir > doom3-darkmod, v1.08-1, orphan > thedarkmod, v2.0-4, maintainer naelstrof I emailed the maintainers and the decision was to kee

[aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread tuftedocelot
Thanks for orphaning all of the packages. I'll go through them and figure out which ones are stale and can be deleted and which ones can be kept. I'll submit changes necessary in a single request rather than spamming the list with removal requests. Lucas

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Nowaker wrote: > I've disowned mcabber-hg and all ood modules (they were all flagged more >> than a year ago). Adopt away! >> > > Maxime, I think you should disown all non-ood mcabber-* too. See the "Last > Updated" for a few. Should anyone mark a package out of da

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread Nowaker
I've disowned mcabber-hg and all ood modules (they were all flagged more than a year ago). Adopt away! Maxime, I think you should disown all non-ood mcabber-* too. See the "Last Updated" for a few. Should anyone mark a package out of date, it gets removed at 23:00. https://aur.archlinux.org/

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Nowaker wrote: > One interesting thing to note is that the last updated date will change on >> a regular basis (usually around 23:00), but the PKGBUILD itself is >> unchanged. >> > > Sounds like anti-mark-out-of-date bot. Nice one. > > There are several mcabber-mod

Re: [aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread Nowaker
One interesting thing to note is that the last updated date will change on a regular basis (usually around 23:00), but the PKGBUILD itself is unchanged. Sounds like anti-mark-out-of-date bot. Nice one. There are several mcabber-module-* packages that are out of date, a TU should consider diso

Re: [aur-general] TU application sponsored by David Reisner

2014-02-05 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi Anatol, Thanks for applying. Your AUR packages looks solid and I have a good impression of you from having communicated before. If you become a TU and wish to adopt my ruby-related packages, I would be happy to give them away. :) -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

[aur-general] [mcabber-hg] Disownment Request

2014-02-05 Thread tuftedocelot
To whom it may concern, I am requesting disownment of the mcabber-hg[1] AUR package so I may claim maintainership. I contacted the current maintainer two weeks ago[2] about merging in my PKGBUILD to improve functionality, but also to bring it up to the current PKGBUILD standards. I have not rec

Re: [aur-general] Package of Questionable Legality

2014-02-05 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Emil Lundberg wrote: >> This doesn't matter though. The AUR does not host any software that >> may or may not be used for copyright infringement. The AUR is simply a >> collection of build scripts. > > Keep in mind that this exact argument was used by The Pirate Ba

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 at 13:17:25, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least > 500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000 > users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and > you think it

Re: [aur-general] Package of Questionable Legality

2014-02-05 Thread Emil Lundberg
> This doesn't matter though. The AUR does not host any software that > may or may not be used for copyright infringement. The AUR is simply a > collection of build scripts. Keep in mind that this exact argument was used by The Pirate Bay in Swedish court, and they were struck down for "facilitati

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-02-05 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 35 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days