On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:17 PM, wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm the maintainer of the 'antichamber' package.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber/
>
> Another guy made a duplicate called 'antichamber-hib'.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber-hib/
>
> They both have the same fu
> I have merged the package "q" to "q-lang", so now you can upload your
> package under the name "q."
>
> I will probably merge the "q-lang" into "pure" but first I want to
> investigate those two a bit more.
Thanks for the quick reply. It's done on my side too.
Regards,
Fabien
W dniu 27.02.2014 16:39, Felix Yan pisze:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 16:37:11 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
A small issue - the top coment on [2] (dated 2013-08-12
19:58) completely does not match the current situation. Can I ask for
deleting it or do we have to live with it :)?
Removed, thanks
On 27 February 2014 21:30, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
>
>> On 23 February 2014 05:02, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche > >wrote:
>> >
>> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/
>> >>
>> >> A
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Fabien Dubosson
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just discovered a tool called `q` [1] and I have done a PKGBUILD to
> try it. As it can be a useful to someone else, I was going to push it to
> AUR.
>
> But there exists already a package called `q` [2] (yeah, 26 letters are
>
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 16:37:11 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
> A small issue - the top coment on [2] (dated 2013-08-12
19:58)
> completely does not match the current situation. Can I ask for
deleting
> it or do we have to live with it :)?
>
> Maciek
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signa
W dniu 27.02.2014 08:55, Felix Yan pisze:
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 18:51:33 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
Could you merge grass7-svn [1] into grass70-svn [2]? Preserving the
votes please, if that is possible.
Merged.
Thank you very much!
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grass7-svn
[
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> On 23 February 2014 05:02, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche >wrote:
> >
> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/
> >>
> >> Appears to be the same packaged data as
> >> https://aur.arch
Hello,
I just discovered a tool called `q` [1] and I have done a PKGBUILD to
try it. As it can be a useful to someone else, I was going to push it to
AUR.
But there exists already a package called `q` [2] (yeah, 26 letters are
not enough for all packages) so the usual way is to call the new one
o
On 23 February 2014 05:02, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
>
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/
>>
>> Appears to be the same packaged data as
>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ except it doesn't
>> build properly. No
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 4 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
11 matches
Mail list logo