[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-02-27 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

2014-02-27 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 23 February 2014 05:02, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: > >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ >> >> Appears to be the same packaged data as >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ except it doesn't >> build properly. No

[aur-general] Using old package name for new software

2014-02-27 Thread Fabien Dubosson
Hello, I just discovered a tool called `q` [1] and I have done a PKGBUILD to try it. As it can be a useful to someone else, I was going to push it to AUR. But there exists already a package called `q` [2] (yeah, 26 letters are not enough for all packages) so the usual way is to call the new one o

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

2014-02-27 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > On 23 February 2014 05:02, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche >wrote: > > > >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ > >> > >> Appears to be the same packaged data as > >> https://aur.arch

Re: [aur-general] grass7-svn -> grass70-svn merge req and a votes merge question

2014-02-27 Thread Maciej Sieczka
W dniu 27.02.2014 08:55, Felix Yan pisze: On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 18:51:33 Maciej Sieczka wrote: Could you merge grass7-svn [1] into grass70-svn [2]? Preserving the votes please, if that is possible. Merged. Thank you very much! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grass7-svn [

Re: [aur-general] grass7-svn -> grass70-svn merge req and a votes merge question

2014-02-27 Thread Felix Yan
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 16:37:11 Maciej Sieczka wrote: > A small issue - the top coment on [2] (dated 2013-08-12 19:58) > completely does not match the current situation. Can I ask for deleting > it or do we have to live with it :)? > > Maciek Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signa

Re: [aur-general] Using old package name for new software

2014-02-27 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Fabien Dubosson wrote: > Hello, > > I just discovered a tool called `q` [1] and I have done a PKGBUILD to > try it. As it can be a useful to someone else, I was going to push it to > AUR. > > But there exists already a package called `q` [2] (yeah, 26 letters are >

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

2014-02-27 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 27 February 2014 21:30, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote: > >> On 23 February 2014 05:02, Maxime Gauduin wrote: >> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche > >wrote: >> > >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ >> >> >> >> A

Re: [aur-general] grass7-svn -> grass70-svn merge req and a votes merge question

2014-02-27 Thread Maciej Sieczka
W dniu 27.02.2014 16:39, Felix Yan pisze: On Thursday, February 27, 2014 16:37:11 Maciej Sieczka wrote: A small issue - the top coment on [2] (dated 2013-08-12 19:58) completely does not match the current situation. Can I ask for deleting it or do we have to live with it :)? Removed, thanks

Re: [aur-general] Using old package name for new software

2014-02-27 Thread Fabien Dubosson
> I have merged the package "q" to "q-lang", so now you can upload your > package under the name "q." > > I will probably merge the "q-lang" into "pure" but first I want to > investigate those two a bit more. Thanks for the quick reply. It's done on my side too. Regards, Fabien

Re: [aur-general] Deletion Request: antichamber-hib

2014-02-27 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:17 PM, wrote: > Hey, > > I'm the maintainer of the 'antichamber' package. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber/ > > Another guy made a duplicate called 'antichamber-hib'. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/antichamber-hib/ > > They both have the same fu