[aur-general] Quick question about sl

Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in community yet? It's got over three hundred votes; is there a reason for

Re: [aur-general] Quick question about sl

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:16 AM, David Phillips wrote: > Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel > confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something > that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in communit

Re: [aur-general] Quick question about sl

Ahh, okay, that makes sense. I thought that would be the case -- these guys 'n' gals are volunteers after all. On 14/03/2014, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:16 AM, David Phillips > wrote: >> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel >> confident it is), b

Re: [aur-general] Quick question about sl

On 14/03/14 03:16 AM, David Phillips wrote: > Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel > confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something > that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in community yet? It's

Re: [aur-general] Quick question about sl

Hey, It may not be funny, but it's a classic :-) But no, no that's fair enough. On 14/03/2014, Daniel Micay wrote: > On 14/03/14 03:16 AM, David Phillips wrote: >> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel >> confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] Deletion of jnc64

On Thursday, March 13, 2014 13:52:49 q9 wrote: > Please delete jnc64 from aur, it is a duplicate of jnc. > Thanks. Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] Orphan deltarpm-git

Hi, could someone please orphan the deltarpm-git [1] package? I emailed the owner ~1 week ago with no response, and the package has been out of date since October. Cheers, Ben. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deltarpm-git/

Re: [aur-general] Orphan deltarpm-git

Hi, On 14/03/14 13:20, Ben Reedy wrote: > Hi, could someone please orphan the deltarpm-git [1] package? I emailed > the owner ~1 week ago with no response, and the package has been out of > date since October. Disowned. Please adopt it. -- Regards, Martin.

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

Hi again! I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Cheers, Pyro Devil Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil: > Hi! > > I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and > request removal because of duplicatio

[aur-general] [Request for disown] mitmproxy-git

Hi! I hereby formally request the compulsory expropriation of the mitmproxy-git package from its current owner alphazo. ;) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitmproxy-git/ Because the current owner seems not to update this package anymore. I suggested about 2 months ago to replace git

[aur-general] Merge Request: nginx-lua-pg into nginx-lua-postgres

Hello TUs, Please merge nginx-lua-pg into nginx-lua-postgres, since the latter provides more understandable name to users. Thank you. nginx-lua-pg is at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-lua-pg/ nginx-lua-postgres is at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-lua-postgres/ Cheers, Lance

Re: [aur-general] [Request for disown] mitmproxy-git

On 14/03/14 12:55 PM, Pyro Devil wrote: > Hi! > > I hereby formally request the compulsory expropriation of the > mitmproxy-git package from its current owner alphazo. ;) > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitmproxy-git/ > > Because the current owner seems not to update this package anymore.

Re: [aur-general] Merge Request: nginx-lua-pg into nginx-lua-postgres

On Saturday, March 15, 2014 02:14:36 Lance Chen wrote: > Hello TUs, > > Please merge nginx-lua-pg into nginx-lua-postgres, since the latter > provides more understandable name to users. Thank you. > > nginx-lua-pg is at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-lua-pg/ > nginx-lua-postgres is at >

Re: [aur-general] Cannot log in to AUR

Hi, I am trying to log in to AUR but cannot do it. It seems there is a problem with my username because I have just resetted my password but it still does not work. What should I do? Thank you very much for your answer! Regards, Fiumara, Pablo Alejandro

Re: [aur-general] Cannot log in to AUR

On Friday, March 14, 2014 23:28:15 Pablo Alejandro Fiumara wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to log in to AUR but cannot do it. > > It seems there is a problem with my username because I have just resetted > my password but it still does not work. What should I do? > > Thank you very much for your an

Re: [aur-general] Cannot log in to AUR

Hi Felix, Thank you very much for answering fast. You solved my problem. Thanks! Kind regards, Fiumara, Pablo Alejandro On 14 March 2014 23:30, Felix Yan wrote: > On Friday, March 14, 2014 23:28:15 Pablo Alejandro Fiumara wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am trying to log in to AUR but cannot do it