Hi Felix,
Thank you very much for answering fast. You solved my problem. Thanks!
Kind regards,
Fiumara, Pablo Alejandro
On 14 March 2014 23:30, Felix Yan wrote:
> On Friday, March 14, 2014 23:28:15 Pablo Alejandro Fiumara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to log in to AUR but cannot do it
On Friday, March 14, 2014 23:28:15 Pablo Alejandro Fiumara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to log in to AUR but cannot do it.
>
> It seems there is a problem with my username because I have just resetted
> my password but it still does not work. What should I do?
>
> Thank you very much for your an
Hi,
I am trying to log in to AUR but cannot do it.
It seems there is a problem with my username because I have just resetted
my password but it still does not work. What should I do?
Thank you very much for your answer!
Regards,
Fiumara, Pablo Alejandro
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 02:14:36 Lance Chen wrote:
> Hello TUs,
>
> Please merge nginx-lua-pg into nginx-lua-postgres, since the latter
> provides more understandable name to users. Thank you.
>
> nginx-lua-pg is at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-lua-pg/
> nginx-lua-postgres is at
>
On 14/03/14 12:55 PM, Pyro Devil wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I hereby formally request the compulsory expropriation of the
> mitmproxy-git package from its current owner alphazo. ;)
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitmproxy-git/
>
> Because the current owner seems not to update this package anymore.
Hello TUs,
Please merge nginx-lua-pg into nginx-lua-postgres, since the latter
provides more understandable name to users. Thank you.
nginx-lua-pg is at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-lua-pg/
nginx-lua-postgres is at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nginx-lua-postgres/
Cheers,
Lance
Hi!
I hereby formally request the compulsory expropriation of the
mitmproxy-git package from its current owner alphazo. ;)
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mitmproxy-git/
Because the current owner seems not to update this package anymore.
I suggested about 2 months ago to replace
git
Hi again!
I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
still exists. ;)
Cheers,
Pyro Devil
Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil:
> Hi!
>
> I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and
> request removal because of duplicatio
Hi,
On 14/03/14 13:20, Ben Reedy wrote:
> Hi, could someone please orphan the deltarpm-git [1] package? I emailed
> the owner ~1 week ago with no response, and the package has been out of
> date since October.
Disowned. Please adopt it.
--
Regards, Martin.
Hi, could someone please orphan the deltarpm-git [1] package? I emailed
the owner ~1 week ago with no response, and the package has been out of
date since October.
Cheers,
Ben.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/deltarpm-git/
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 13:52:49 q9 wrote:
> Please delete jnc64 from aur, it is a duplicate of jnc.
> Thanks.
Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
Hey, It may not be funny, but it's a classic :-) But no, no that's fair enough.
On 14/03/2014, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 14/03/14 03:16 AM, David Phillips wrote:
>> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel
>> confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something
On 14/03/14 03:16 AM, David Phillips wrote:
> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel
> confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something
> that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in community yet? It's
Ahh, okay, that makes sense. I thought that would be the case -- these
guys 'n' gals are volunteers after all.
On 14/03/2014, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:16 AM, David Phillips
> wrote:
>> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel
>> confident it is), b
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:16 AM, David Phillips wrote:
> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel
> confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something
> that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in communit
Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel
confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something
that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in community yet? It's got
over three hundred votes; is there a reason for
17 matches
Mail list logo