[aur-general] ORPHAN REQUEST - AUR package - PLYMOUTH

2014-03-17 Thread Padfoot
Hi, Can I please request the following package to be orphaned so I may take up maintenance of it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plymouth/ As per the email below, I contacted the current maintainer 2 weeks ago and have not received a response. Thanks. Lachlan. Original Mess

Re: [aur-general] Move vagrant to [community]?

2014-03-17 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Tue 11 Mar 2014 at 19:48, Jonathan Steel wrote: > On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 19:34, Jonathan Steel wrote: > > On Fri 21 Feb 2014 at 12:51, Ido Rosen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I maintain vagrant package in AUR. I believe vagrant is a very useful > > > tool > > > for ArchLinux users. I am happy

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-03-17 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 18:37, Jonathan Steel wrote: > On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 19:24, Nowaker wrote: > > > > >>I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package > > >>still exists. ;) > > > > >Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. > > > > There w

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-03-17 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 19:24, Nowaker wrote: > > >>I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package > >>still exists. ;) > > >Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. > > There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move was

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-03-17 Thread Nowaker
I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move was to removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into light

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks

2014-03-17 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Fri 14 Mar 2014 at 17:36, Pyro Devil wrote: > Hi again! > > I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package > still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. > Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil: > > Hi! > >

Re: [aur-general] Disown requests

2014-03-17 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:18 PM, carstene1ns wrote: > Hello, > please disown ta3d[1], libclaw[2] and plee-the-bear[3]. > I contacted maintainer darkbaboon with a patch for ta3d (2014-01-19) and > received no response. The other two packages are out of date and can be > updated easily. > > Also, p

[aur-general] Disown requests

2014-03-17 Thread carstene1ns
Hello, please disown ta3d[1], libclaw[2] and plee-the-bear[3]. I contacted maintainer darkbaboon with a patch for ta3d (2014-01-19) and received no response. The other two packages are out of date and can be updated easily. Also, please disown opensonic[4]. It does not build against recent libpng

Re: [aur-general] delete request mesa-r600-r700

2014-03-17 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:54 PM, LoneVVolf wrote: > Hi, > > please delete mesa-r600-r700-git package [1]. > reasons : > > orphan > last updated in dec 2011 > flagged out-of-date since june 10, 2013 > > There are several maintained alternatives, like aur mesa-git package [2], > Lordheavy's unoffi

[aur-general] delete request mesa-r600-r700

2014-03-17 Thread LoneVVolf
Hi, please delete mesa-r600-r700-git package [1]. reasons : orphan last updated in dec 2011 flagged out-of-date since june 10, 2013 There are several maintained alternatives, like aur mesa-git package [2], Lordheavy's unofficial mesa-git repo [3] and my own mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git packag

Re: [aur-general] [Removal] kdnssd-framework-git

2014-03-17 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, March 17, 2014 12:17:44 Antonio Rojas wrote: > Replaced with kdnssd-git > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdnssd-framework-git/ > > Thanks Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[aur-general] [Removal] kdnssd-framework-git

2014-03-17 Thread Antonio Rojas
Replaced with kdnssd-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdnssd-framework-git/ Thanks

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: velox and velox-git

2014-03-17 Thread Brian F. G. Bidulock
Lukas, On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock > wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > > > >> Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/velox > >> and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/velox-git

Re: [aur-general] AUR cleanup

2014-03-17 Thread Martin Wimpress
On 17/03/14 08:52, Alexander wrote: > Please remove the following package: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jcloisterzone2/ > > as it provides the same stuff as > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jcloisterzone/ > Deleted as requested. -- Regards, Martin.

[aur-general] AUR cleanup

2014-03-17 Thread Alexander
Please remove the following package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jcloisterzone2/ as it provides the same stuff as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jcloisterzone/ -- With regards, Polovtcev Alexander

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: velox and velox-git

2014-03-17 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > >> Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/velox >> and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/velox-git >> >> => not updated in over a year >> => no response to emails

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: waimea

2014-03-17 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Please disown https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/waimea > > => not updated in 7 years > => no response emails to maintainer in last 6 months > => I have updated PKGBUILD ready to go > > --brian Disowned.

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-03-17 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days