On Thursday 10 April 2014 22:17:20 David Phillips wrote:
> Hi, please merge [1] into [2] as [2] now provides the features of [1]
> so there's no need for the patched version, [1].
Done, thank you.
--
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.
e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-2
On Thursday 10 April 2014 18:28:23 Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
> This package has been renamed upstream to python2-bitcoin.
Done. Please provide links in the next time.
--
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.
e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru
sig
On Friday 11 April 2014 03:59:32 Артём wrote:
> I maintainer iou-web-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iou-web-git/),
> I ask you to please remove the package iou-web-git, as a program developer
> removed git repository and package later does not work.
According to information on the webpage
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> > Doesn't every language with its own package manager have this problem?
> For example, Python. Is there a good solution? Users knowing about this
> issue and making their own decisions is the current solution on every
> distro I'm familiar
> Doesn't every language with its own package manager have this problem?
For example, Python. Is there a good solution? Users knowing about this
issue and making their own decisions is the current solution on every
distro I'm familiar with.
Aye. There are some upshots to allowing users to instal
On 04/09/2014 01:27 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
Problem 2: Users are confused whether they should install packages from the
repos or using cabal-install. This in turn sometimes causes them to install
some packages from official repos, some from the aur, and some using
cabal-install
Explanation: Pa
This package has been renamed upstream to python2-bitcoin.
On 11/04/14 00:59, Артём wrote:
Hello
I maintainer iou-web-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iou-web-git/), I
ask you to please remove the package iou-web-git, as a program developer
removed git repository and package later does not work.
Are you sure? This repository here seems perfec
Hello
I maintainer iou-web-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iou-web-git/), I
ask you to please remove the package iou-web-git, as a program developer
removed git repository and package later does not work.
On Thu 10 Apr 2014 at 20:42, Bertrand Bonnefoy-Claudet wrote:
> [...]
>
> vagrant has recently been accepted in community and has a PKGBUILD that
> I find peculiar. It seems like it uses some embedded directory to store
> gems it depends on. [...]
There wasn't really a choice; I intended to insta
Hi
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Bertrand Bonnefoy-Claudet
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> veewee [1] is a great tool for building vagrant boxes. Unfortunately, it
> depends on many other gems. I've already built a package ruby-veewee [2]
> using Arch packages as dependencies and there is a git version,
Hello,
veewee [1] is a great tool for building vagrant boxes. Unfortunately, it
depends on many other gems. I've already built a package ruby-veewee [2]
using Arch packages as dependencies and there is a git version,
veewee-git [3], but I find them unsatisfactory because of how difficult
they are
Hi, please merge [1] into [2] as [2] now provides the features of [1]
so there's no need for the patched version, [1].
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq-fr/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq-archlinux/
Cheers
--
David Phillips
GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B
Fingerprint 24
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 10:13:47 James Bulmer wrote:
> As requested a few days ago,
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cinderclient-deb/
>
> needs removing as we have moved to
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cinderclient/
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
sign
As requested a few days ago,
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cinderclient-deb/
needs removing as we have moved to
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-cinderclient/
Thanks!
-- James
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 5 packages missing signoffs
* 1 package older than 14 days
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 09/04/14 11:12 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Now that aside is finished, what is the deal with that arch-haskell
>> group? Is it still going? Would they want to provide packages
>> officially instead?
>
> It's definitely still active. They se
17 matches
Mail list logo
