=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 100 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14
Please merge [0] into [1], as the package [0] didn't fit APS (with source code
in PKGBUILD tarball) and I have uploaded a new one ([1]). Both pkg maintained
by myself.
[0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursor-vista-aero/
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursor-ize-vision/
On 1 May 2014 02:30, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote:
Yep, that was the concern exactly. Nothing insurmountable, just wanting to
clarify how it works upfront.
I share this concern. I've just uploaded slim-git [1] to the aur-dev:
pkgbase=slim-git
pkgname=('slim-git'
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:04:07PM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
On 1 May 2014 02:30, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote:
Yep, that was the concern exactly. Nothing insurmountable, just wanting to
clarify how it works upfront.
I share this concern. I've just uploaded slim-git [1]
On 1 May 2014 13:29, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:04:07PM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
On 1 May 2014 02:30, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote:
Yep, that was the concern exactly. Nothing insurmountable, just wanting to
clarify how it works
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 02:04:42PM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
On 1 May 2014 13:29, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:04:07PM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
On 1 May 2014 02:30, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote:
Yep, that was the concern
On 30/04/14 23:20, Lukas Fleischer wrote:
A first release candidate of the AUR 3.0.0 has been released! You can
give it a try at [1]. Note that due to internal changes, the setup at
aur-dev.archlinux.org uses a different database than aur.archlinux.org.
You should be able login using your
On Thursday, May 01, 2014 18:48:33 Izumi Natsuka wrote:
Please merge [0] into [1], as the package [0] didn't fit APS (with source
code in PKGBUILD tarball) and I have uploaded a new one ([1]). Both pkg
maintained by myself.
[0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursor-vista-aero/
[1]:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-xft-space/
The only point of this package was to add a patch of mine that was
already integrated in the package dmenu-xft. I'm going to disown it
and flag it out-of-date. Please remove it.
So, techinically,
if I can get this font by a third-party website that offers it for free, to
personal use, can I pack?
---
*Gabriel B. Casella http://gbc921.github.io/*
Nothing is impossible, impossible just takes longer
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Doug Newgard
On 01/05/14 10:35 PM, Gabriel B. Casella wrote:
So, techinically,
if I can get this font by a third-party website that offers it for free, to
personal use, can I pack?
You can if it's hosted legally. The AUR is not a place to post links to
pirated software.
signature.asc
Description:
11 matches
Mail list logo