Hi,
The packages are still no merged, can review it.
Thanks.
El 07/05/2014 23:49, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca escribió:
On 2014-05-07 23:15 +0200
Rick wrote:
Hi,
Can I please get [1] 'dkms-8192cu
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-8192cu/' merged in to [2]
'8192cu-dkms
Hi
This script [1] is orphan and no longer works.
I suggest deleting this pkgbuild.
Thanks
[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/check-kernel
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 09:39:22 Damien wrote:
Hi
This script [1] is orphan and no longer works.
I suggest deleting this pkgbuild.
Thanks
[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/check-kernel
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 13 packages missing signoffs
* 1 package older than 14 days
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Rick runn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The packages are still no merged, can review it.
Thanks.
El 07/05/2014 23:49, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca escribió:
On 2014-05-07 23:15 +0200
Rick wrote:
Hi,
Can I please get [1] 'dkms-8192cu
On 2014-05-08 10:50 +0530
Amish wrote:
On 05/08/2014 02:21 AM, Marcel Korpel wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote:
I believe cryptocrack has said that the entire notification system needs an
overhaul, and things like this won't get implemented
On 2014-05-08 08:44 +0200
Rick wrote:
Hi,
The packages are still no merged, can review it.
Huh? I merged [1] into [2] as requested. dkms-8192cu ([1]) no longer exists
(404) and the votes now appear on the other. The merge appears to have been
successful.
Thanks.
El 07/05/2014 23:49, Xyne
On 2014-05-08 14:10 +
Xyne wrote:
To give another example, I have attached a very simple script
that accepts a list of package names and prints out their last modification
times in a sorted list. It depends on python3-aur.
The attachments seems to have been stripped. You can find the script
On 05/08/2014 07:40 PM, Xyne wrote:
On 2014-05-08 10:50 +0530
Amish wrote:
I added one line in package update Guidelines for Maintainer.
Here is the link:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Maintaining_packages
Here is the line added:
After submitting the update,
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:06:15PM +0530, Amish wrote:
On 05/08/2014 07:40 PM, Xyne wrote:
On 2014-05-08 10:50 +0530
Amish wrote:
I added one line in package update Guidelines for Maintainer.
Here is the link:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Maintaining_packages
* Amish ammdispose-a...@yahoo.com [2014-05-08 20:06:15 +0530]:
On 05/08/2014 07:40 PM, Xyne wrote:
On 2014-05-08 10:50 +0530
Amish wrote:
I added one line in package update Guidelines for Maintainer.
Here is the link:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If we ever have a proper notifocation system inbuilt, I hope it will
be optional per user because I don't want to be flooded with emails
about package updates. Seeing them in my AUR helper before updating is
also enough for me
- -- nekinie
On
On 05/08/2014 08:22 PM, James Bulmer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If we ever have a proper notifocation system inbuilt, I hope it will
be optional per user because I don't want to be flooded with emails
about package updates. Seeing them in my AUR helper before
3) I think commenting about update will involve more people and bring
awareness that the AUR package is active and not orphaned.
This is true, but should not be implemented like that. That's good it
has been reverted.
AUR could keep track of the updates, e.g. have a new field named
Updates
On 8 May 2014 17:09, Nowaker enwuk...@gmail.com wrote:
3) I think commenting about update will involve more people and bring
awareness that the AUR package is active and not orphaned.
This is true, but should not be implemented like that. That's good it has
been reverted.
AUR could keep
On 2014-05-08 18:09 +0200
Nowaker wrote:
3) I think commenting about update will involve more people and bring
awareness that the AUR package is active and not orphaned.
This is true, but should not be implemented like that. That's good it
has been reverted.
AUR could keep track of the
On 2014-05-08 14:13 +
Xyne wrote:
On 2014-05-08 08:44 +0200
Rick wrote:
Hi,
The packages are still no merged, can review it.
Huh? I merged [1] into [2] as requested. dkms-8192cu ([1]) no longer exists
(404) and the votes now appear on the other. The merge appears to have been
successful.
Hi,
Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in
2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts.
I'd suggest its removal.
Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old
initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its
Hi,
Here are the info:
Package name: ktsuss-svn
Package url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ktsuss-svn/
Reason for deletion: development has moved to github.
I have created the package ktsuss-git for that purpose.
Cheers,
Valère
19 matches
Mail list logo
