=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 41 packages missing signoffs
* 1 package older than 14 days
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:16 AM, John D Jones III
wrote:
> Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-
> requirements/ the module it provides is now in core perl
> --
> Thanks,
> John D Jones III
> UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
> unixgeek1...@gmail.com
> jnbek1...@gmail.com
> http:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:23 AM, John D Jones III
wrote:
> please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-io-socket-ip/ the
> module it provides is now provided in core_perl
> --
> Thanks,
> John D Jones III
> UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover
> unixgeek1...@gmail.com
> jnbek1...@gmail.com
> http://
On Thursday, June 12, 2014 21:15:29 kevku wrote:
> Requesting deletion of the following:
>
> 1. Old ESTeID software packages that now have been surpassed by the official
> version.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/esteid-browser-plugin-svn/
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/java-pkcs11wr
On Thursday 12 June 2014 14:23:51 artux wrote:
> I would like to ask for a package deletion.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eudev-openrc/
>
> Reason: will merge with eudev, feasible with mkaurball to do it
It has no any votes or comments, so I don't think that merge into eudev (as it
wa
On Thursday 12 June 2014 23:11:18 Justin Dray wrote:
> I've recently cleaned up the big pile of skype4pidgin packages in the AUR.
>
> Of the previous maintainers I could contact, they have orphaned the
> packages and I have taken them up prior to deletion/merging or have agreed
> to the merge. The
On Thursday 12 June 2014 23:11:18 Justin Dray wrote:
> Hey,
> I've recently cleaned up the big pile of skype4pidgin packages in the AUR.
>
> Of the previous maintainers I could contact, they have orphaned the
> packages and I have taken them up prior to deletion/merging or have agreed
> to the mer
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nc
Dupe of gnu-netcat
J. Leclanche
No, but the original email asking about cleaning them up was 10 days ago.
Which the other maintainers responded to. I also said this in my original
email to the AUR mailing list: " (this was only around 10 days ago however.
I'm not sure if that means this will still need to wait the full 14 days to
Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rename-git/
Maintainer said it needed removed and abandoned it instead of requesting
that it be deleted:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raspyplayer-git/
Maintainer renamed package, but did not reque
This one might be a bit controversial.
gtkpacman hadn't been updated in over 6 years and hasn't functioned
since pacman 4.1 at least, possibly before. I think it's safe at this
point to say that it's dead. Dead + non-functional = should be removed
IMO. Yes, it was a popular package with over 3
I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody
else is willing, I'll adopt it.
On 14/06/2014, Doug Newgard wrote:
> This one might be a bit controversial.
>
> gtkpacman hadn't been updated in over 6 years and hasn't functioned
> since pacman 4.1 at least, possibly before.
Actually, in light of the information present at
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman_GUI_Frontends I will
retract my previous comment. Too many existing, working Gtk front-ends
for me to bother with gtkpacman.
On 14/06/2014, David Phillips wrote:
> I wonder if anyone's interested in getti
On 2014-06-14 01:27, David Phillips wrote:
I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody
else is willing, I'll adopt it.
You're pretty much talking about forking it to do that. There are
tarballs on Sourceforge, so it should be doable. You'd probably need to
rename th
14 matches
Mail list logo
