[aur-general] deletion request

Please delete ruby-reek. [1] As a tool intended primarily for use by users on the command line, it is badly named, and I have uploaded reek [2] to take its place. There are no votes or comments of worth, so there is little reason to merge packages. I am the maintainer of both packages. — Jeremy "I

Re: [aur-general] Another merge request

On Thursday 19 June 2014 23:02:33 Armin K. wrote: > Can you please merge intel-dri-git [1] into mesa-git [2]. Maintainer has > agreed in the comment section of [1]. Done =) -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabbe

[aur-general] Another merge request

Hello, Can you please merge intel-dri-git [1] into mesa-git [2]. Maintainer has agreed in the comment section of [1]. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intel-dri-git [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mesa-git -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request

On 2014-06-19 17:25, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: > On 19 June 2014 15:38, sinma wrote: >> Oups sorry, it’s hunspell-fr-cpr90-base >> (). > Deleted Thank you very much and sorry for the noise. :) -- mon site web: hack-libre.org

Re: [aur-general] Remove/Merge request

On 19 June 2014 15:21, Armin K. wrote: > Hello, > > Please remove clang-svn [1] package or merge it into llvm-svn [2] > because I will shortly upload a split pkgbuild for llvm-svn that also > builds clang-svn. I maintain both of them. > > Thanks. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clang-sv

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request

On 19 June 2014 15:38, sinma wrote: > > Oups sorry, it’s hunspell-fr-cpr90-base > (). > > -- > mon site web: hack-libre.org > Deleted

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request

On 2014-06-19 15:38, Jonathan Arnold wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:30:01 +0200 > sinma wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have uploaded a PKGBUILD but I want it to be deleted because I made >> a mistake about his name. Can you remove it please? >> >> Thanks by advance, > Name and URL for the package? Oups

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request

On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:30:01 +0200 sinma wrote: > Hi, > > I have uploaded a PKGBUILD but I want it to be deleted because I made > a mistake about his name. Can you remove it please? > > Thanks by advance, > Name and URL for the package? -- Jonathan ArnoldWebstream: http://hieronymus

[aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request

Hi, I have uploaded a PKGBUILD but I want it to be deleted because I made a mistake about his name. Can you remove it please? Thanks by advance, -- mon site web: hack-libre.org

[aur-general] Remove/Merge request

Hello, Please remove clang-svn [1] package or merge it into llvm-svn [2] because I will shortly upload a split pkgbuild for llvm-svn that also builds clang-svn. I maintain both of them. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clang-svn [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llvm-svn --

Re: [aur-general] merge request

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jeremy Audet wrote: > Please merge ruby-nanoc [1] into nanoc [2]. Nanoc is primarily intended for > use by end users, not as a library. Thus, according to the packaging > guidelines, the language-specific prefix should be stripped. I maintain > both packages. > >

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: bitscope-dev -> bitscope-dso

On 18 June 2014 17:17, Ente wrote: > Hello > > please merge the packet: > bitscope-dev https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitscope-dev/ > > into: > bitscope-dso https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitscope-dso/ > > the resulting packet should be: > bitscope-dso https://aur.archlinux.org/packa

Re: [aur-general] Please delete dwm-sprinkles-svn-experimental

On 18 June 2014 13:29, Runiq wrote: > On 18.06.2014 12:49:26, Runiq wrote: >> >> See subject line, the package is here [1]. The upstream SVN branch doesn't >> exist anymore, and development has moved to Github [2]. >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dwm-sprinkles-svn-experimental >> [2]