Re: [aur-general] Orphan Request

2014-06-24 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Am Mittwoch, den 25.06.2014, 07:08 +0200 schrieb Stefan Tatschner: > this package [1] seems to be unmaintained since almost one year and it > does not follow the naming conventions of python packages. I would like > to adopt this when someone orphans this for me. :) > > Stefan > > [1]: https://au

[aur-general] Orphan Request

2014-06-24 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Hi, this package [1] seems to be unmaintained since almost one year and it does not follow the naming conventions of python packages. I would like to adopt this when someone orphans this for me. :) Stefan [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-pipeline/

[aur-general] merge request

2014-06-24 Thread Jeremy Audet
Please merge ruby-adsf [1] into adsf [2]. adsf is primarily intended for use by end users, not as a library. Thus, according to the packaging guidelines in the wiki, the language-specific prefix should be stripped. I maintain both packages. — Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet [1] https://aur.archlinux.o

[aur-general] Delete request: xfreq-intel-git

2014-06-24 Thread ccy
Hello, I am the developer / package creator and accidentally made this entry: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xfreq-intel-git/ May you please remove it from the AUR Thank you CyrIng

Re: [aur-general] packages vim-*-support

2014-06-24 Thread Johannes Löthberg
On 24/06, Piotr Rogoża wrote: On 22.06.2014 17:03, Johannes Löthberg wrote: If they're common then consider having a common package for those files. Common name but no common contents. In that case I'd rather suggest you try talking with the upstreams and get them to rectify it. -- Sinc

Re: [aur-general] Dependancies and Split Packages

2014-06-24 Thread Johannes Löthberg
Hey, Your descriptions are quite confusing and doesn't seem to make much sense, please tell us the exact commands you are using and the verbatim output of all of them. -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 3A9D0BB5 pgpf9vFtHSWmE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [aur-general] packages vim-*-support

2014-06-24 Thread Piotr Rogoża
On 22.06.2014 17:03, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > If they're common then consider having a common package for those files. > Common name but no common contents. -- Kind regards Piotr Rogoża

Re: [aur-general] wxpython3 removal request

2014-06-24 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 14:34:45 Stefan Husmann wrote: > Hello, > > I hope this has no been brought up already: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython3/ is a duplicate of the wxpython > in [extra]. > > Please consider deleting it. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc D

[aur-general] wxpython3 removal request

2014-06-24 Thread Stefan Husmann
Hello, I hope this has no been brought up already: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython3/ is a duplicate of the wxpython in [extra]. Please consider deleting it. Best Regards Stefan

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-06-24 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 1 package missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (