[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-07-08 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released

2014-07-08 Thread Attila Bukor
There are two types of comments imho: a) discussion about how the package should be improved, etc; b) the package doesn't build in some cases, which *needs* attention from the maintainer. Even in case the maintainer is subscribed to notifications, they can miss these b) kinds of comments if

Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.3.0 released

2014-07-08 Thread Steven Honeyman
The trouble is there are too many people that don't (or can't) think about *why* something might not be working. It's often the users' fault :) Suppose someone sets ld.gold as their default linker because the internet told them it was better... and then tries to compile imagemagick... Steven.

[aur-general] Troll account

2014-07-08 Thread Rob McCathie
Hello AUR General, I am a Manjaro team member and have been an Arch user for ~5 years. I still run Arch proper on many systems and test my AUR packages on Arch proper (just thought i'd get that out of the way ;-p ) We've had to remove someone from our team recently due to their abusing of their

Re: [aur-general] Troll account

2014-07-08 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 at 01:09:05, Rob McCathie wrote: Hello AUR General, I am a Manjaro team member and have been an Arch user for ~5 years. I still run Arch proper on many systems and test my AUR packages on Arch proper (just thought i'd get that out of the way ;-p ) We've had to remove