[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-07-28 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] Announcement Input

2014-07-28 Thread Nowaker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like to have something like an announcement input for AUR packages. Just like comments, but the announcement should be editable by the maintainer only and shown at the top all the time. This could be handy for something like: +1 for it!

[aur-general] owncloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]

2014-07-28 Thread Nowaker
Hi, I'd like to suggest owncloud-client as a potential candidate for [community]. It has 300+ votes. owncloud the webapp is already there. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/owncloud-client/ -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu

[aur-general] AUR 3.4.0 released

2014-07-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hello, I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.4.0 has been released. The official AUR setup [1] has already been updated. This release includes several improvements to the package request feature and a couple of bug fixes. The PKGBUILD parser has been dropped, you can no longer upload source

Re: [aur-general] owncloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]

2014-07-28 Thread Kuba Serafinowski
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Nowaker enwuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'd like to suggest owncloud-client as a potential candidate for [community]. It has 300+ votes. owncloud the webapp is already there. How about CC'ing the maintainer at all (in this case me)? I've already had one of my

Re: [aur-general] owncloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]

2014-07-28 Thread Nowaker
I'd like to suggest owncloud-client as a potential candidate for [community]. It has 300+ votes. owncloud the webapp is already there. How about CC'ing the maintainer at all (in this case me)? I've already had one of my PKGBUILDs (kdeconnect) vanish just to reappear in the [community]

Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.4.0 released

2014-07-28 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote: Hello, I am pleased to announce that AUR 3.4.0 has been released. The official AUR setup [1] has already been updated. This release includes several improvements to the package request feature and a couple of

Re: [aur-general] owncloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]

2014-07-28 Thread John D Jones III
On 07/28/14 10:40, Nowaker wrote: If a TU decides to move the package to community, then they should contact you out of kindness, agreed. Trusted Users, can you elaborate if adding a new point to Rules for Packages Entering the [community] Repo [1] would be reasonable? TUs should inform the

Re: [aur-general] AUR 3.4.0 released

2014-07-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 at 21:49:56, Karol Blazewicz wrote: [...] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2do=indexswitch=1 says Note: The AUR is essentially in maintanence mode. No new features are planned. which in light of https://projects.archlinux.org/aur.git/log/?id=v3.4.0