=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 3 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
Hello all,
So I'm just wondering if the change should go ahead now as the idea has
been floating around for nearly a week and nobody has raised objections.
Regarding the 0.9 bzr package, that would involve me uploading compiz-bzr
and then requesting compiz-core-bzr be merged.
Regarding the
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Balló György ballog...@gmail.com
wrote:
2014. 07. 31, csütörtök keltezéssel 01.06-kor Muflone ezt írta:
Hi everyone
My name's Fabio Castelli (aka Muflone) from Italy and I wish to
apply to
become a TU for ArchLinux to maintain some packages in the
Hi Fabio Castelli,
The AUR packages I looked at was in good shape. I really like that you
also have contributed to Debian, started out with C64 and have a few
open source projects.
However, the webdesign at vbsimple.net* is crazy and I hope you never
get the chance to redesign the archlinux.org
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
However, the webdesign at vbsimple.net* is crazy and I hope you never
get the chance to redesign the archlinux.org webpage**. ;)
I'm partially interested what that would look like for a good laugh... xD
cheers!
On 7/30/14, Muflone web...@vbsimple.net wrote:
My name's Fabio Castelli (aka Muflone) from Italy and I wish to apply to
become a TU for ArchLinux to maintain some packages in the community
repository. My TU sponsor is György Balló.
Good to see you applying! Your technical chops look pretty
Hi Charles,
I think it makes more sense for you to take over my package.
As I mentioned, it's basically a derivative of the bzr package. I do
enjoy maintaining packages but I figured, as the bzr package receives
development, it would be simple enough for you to apply any changes to
both
We had this conversation 4 months ago where I said we should name
compiz-core-devel - compiz and compiz-core-bzr - compiz-bzr but
alucryd insisted on the naming scheme that currently exists.
---
In regards to compiz-core-devel:
Comment by beardedlinuxgeek 2014-04-02 06:55
If you want to
Guess i'll stop bottom posting when everyone else is top posting :P
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Colin Robinson
beardedlinuxg...@gmail.com wrote:
Comment by alucryd 2014-04-02 07:25
beardedlinuxgeek: Wrong, the latest stable branch is 0.8.x, the 0.9.x
branch is unstable.
This is simply
I totally agree with you. I was just pointing out why the packages are
named the way they are. Please change them unless alucryd wants to weigh
in on the discussion.
On 07/31/2014 08:36 PM, Rob McCathie wrote:
Guess i'll stop bottom posting when everyone else is top posting :P
On Fri, Aug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Not much to ask you apart from the usual: are you maybe interested
in taking over some of our orphans [1] ?
[1]
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=repo=Communityq=maintainer=orphanflagged=
While
I haven't yet tried to build them I
However, the webdesign at vbsimple.net* is crazy and I hope you never
get the chance to redesign the archlinux.org webpage**. ;)
I'm partially interested what that would look like for a good laugh... xD
Ouch! that's unfair!
I admit to be the designer of that crap website but in such old
Hello
(except don't use the cute DLAGENT from iseriesaccess in anything
official)
I'm open to suggestions how to handle the packaging of applications
whose source files cannot be redistributed or directly downloaded (the
IBM website requires you first login to your account, then that you
Hey guys!
I will be inactive starting Monday 4th August. I will be moving to a
different city for a job (yay, for the first time I'm gong to be paid
for programming :-)) and I won't have an Internet connection for some
time except from the mobile phone.
Anyway, from the packaging side most of my
Hi all,
I'd like to amend my previous request for lldpd and/or ladvd to be
moved to [community] or [extra], and add these packages:
nagios
nagios-nrpe
nagios-nrpe-plugin (?)
nagios-nsca
Again, there are not many people using Arch in data center
environments, so the vote counts on these
15 matches
Mail list logo
