While the new AUR request functionality is a good thing and widely
accepted (over 500 requests yet), it also brings us some problems:
(1)inhibition threshold - It is much easier to remove a package now.
(2)response time - Requests get accepted before the package maintainer
or others have time to e
On 17 August 2014 06:25, Ronald Kinard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of
> sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package
> sublime-text-beta be deleted.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-beta/
> ht
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Ronald Kinard
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of
> sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package
> sublime-text-beta be deleted.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-
Hello,
I accidentally uploaded a package which is an effective duplicate of
sublime-text-dev, named sublime-text-beta. I'm requesting that my package
sublime-text-beta be deleted.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-beta/
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-dev/
Thanks
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 at 20:35:10, Xyne wrote:
> [...]
> >Votes are always only stored per package base. You cannot vote on a
> >package.
> >
> >Note that it is also possible to merge two packages into another package
> >without having a transition period where the original packages are
> >unavailabl
On 2014-08-16 20:17 +0200
Lukas Fleischer wrote:
>On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 at 20:00:48, Xyne wrote:
>> [...]
>> At first I thought that the pkgbase could be uploaded without anything in the
>> pkgnames array as a placeholder for merging, but that would lump all the
>> votes into the pkgbase and not the
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 at 20:00:48, Xyne wrote:
> [...]
> At first I thought that the pkgbase could be uploaded without anything in the
> pkgnames array as a placeholder for merging, but that would lump all the votes
> into the pkgbase and not the individual packages.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
Hi,
Is there a standard procedure for replacing packages with split packages while
preserving votes?
For example, lets say there are two normal packages in the AUR, "foo-bar" and
"foo-baz". foo-bar has 20 votes, foo-baz has 15.
The maintainer realizes that he can produce both packages using a sp
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 4 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
