[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2014-12-02 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 14 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days

Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

2014-12-02 Thread LoneVVolf
On 02-12-14 07:07, Nowaker wrote: A custom field in PKGBUILD that AUR will understand would really come in handy. Something like this: pkgissues='https://github.com/Nowaker/aur-packages/issues' p input type=submit value=Add Comment nbsp;nbsp; If you can't build the package, or the package is

Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

2014-12-02 Thread Joakim Hernberg
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 11:43:05 +0100 LoneVVolf lonew...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 02-12-14 07:07, Nowaker wrote: A custom field in PKGBUILD that AUR will understand would really come in handy. Something like this: pkgissues='https://github.com/Nowaker/aur-packages/issues' p input type=submit

Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

2014-12-02 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Joakim Hernberg jhernb...@alchemy.lu wrote: On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 11:43:05 +0100 LoneVVolf lonew...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 02-12-14 07:07, Nowaker wrote: A custom field in PKGBUILD that AUR will understand would really come in handy. Something like this:

Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

2014-12-02 Thread Martti Kühne
Comments have a timestamp. You can, after all, just compare the comment date with the package's upload date. And then again. We could actually have comments more recent than the last source package upload have a wee bit stronger contrast and maybe *bold* font. cheers! mar77i

Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

2014-12-02 Thread mrlemux
I think that a bug tracker would be the best solution, and i see removing comments just as a temporary, hacky solution. as comments are just used for bug tracking anyway. (so we can just replace the comments block below the AUR package with the bug tracker) But if we change it, it should be

Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

2014-12-02 Thread Troy Engel
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Joakim Hernberg jhernb...@alchemy.lu wrote: I for one would really like to see a field on the AUR where I as buildscript maintainer can enter comments regarding the package, like X is broken right now, for y use workaround z, etc. ...along with this, the AUR

Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

2014-12-02 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:11:01 +0100 mrlemux mrle...@gmail.com wrote: comments are just used for bug tracking anyway No, they provide useful information, at least for those of us who are using the frowned upon yaourt. If I run 'yaourt -S' I like to see the comments, because then I don't need to