[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2015-01-03 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 1 known bad package * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 171 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 day

[aur-general] More trolling

2015-01-03 Thread Rob McCathie
Hi AUR general, Previous related posts: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-July/029069.html https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-November/029845.html Once again the pathetic individual who spends their life trolling Manjaro devs is using AUR as a platform f

Re: [aur-general] More trolling

2015-01-03 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 01/03/15 at 09:35pm, Rob McCathie wrote: > Hi AUR general, > > Previous related posts: > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-July/029069.html > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-November/029845.html > > Once again the pathetic individual who spends their

[aur-general] More trolling

2015-01-03 Thread Alexandru Ianu
Hi, The real Allan just removed the account. I'm now removing all his >comments. Lukas, is there an option to remove an account and all the comments made by that account? -- Jelle van der Waa Hi, The troll hit my account as well. The only lasting damage is a comment on the package: yaou

Re: [aur-general] More trolling

2015-01-03 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 15:24:34 +0200, Alexandru Ianu wrote: > The troll hit my account as well. Is somebody able to use any, your or mine account to write this terrible comments? I suspect the origin of those comments is somebody living in one of the few nations where homophobia still is "normal".

Re: [aur-general] Renaming nimrod-git to nim-git

2015-01-03 Thread Doug Newgard
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 21:45:35 +0100 Erik Johansson Andersson wrote: > I'll clarify: I want the history of nimrod-git to remain, hence why > creating a new package called nim-git was a mistake. > It was not a mistake. Packages on the AUR cannot be renamed. You need to create the new package then r

[aur-general] pacworld(3) in AUR

2015-01-03 Thread Troy Engel
Wondering what the right thing to do here is -- there is/was a package "pacworld" that has a dead homepage and source is no longer available (Dropbox link). Someone else came along (violating the guidelines) and made a 'pacworld3' package pointing at another download location of a newer Dropbox tar

Re: [aur-general] pacworld(3) in AUR

2015-01-03 Thread Javier Domingo Cansino
If I used it, I would put it in a github repo, and link it there, take ownership of the package, and invite anyone to take it from you. On Sat Jan 03 2015 at 7:18:29 PM Troy Engel wrote: > Wondering what the right thing to do here is -- there is/was a package > "pacworld" that has a dead homepag

Re: [aur-general] pacworld(3) in AUR

2015-01-03 Thread carstene1ns
Am 03.01.2015 um 19:18 schrieb Troy Engel: > Should we file a delete request for these in AUR? What's the standard > process in this situation to clean things up when upstream/sources > disappear? I think you already did most of the recommended actions. If the source or author disappears, search f

Re: [aur-general] pacworld(3) in AUR

2015-01-03 Thread Troy Engel
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:15 PM, carstene1ns wrote: > > After looking at the source, I think there are tools that have a similar > functionality: e.g. pkg-list_incomplete_packages[1] by TU Xyne does > nearly the same, it checks all files from all packages for availability. Excellent, thanks for th