Re: [aur-general] [Aur4] translations in transifex

2015-05-28 Thread Pablo Lezaeta Reyes
2015-05-28 20:36 GMT-03:00 Lukas Fleischer : > On Thu, 28 May 2015 at 23:13:33, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote: > > I noticed that aur4 have some new strings but the transifex page has not > > pudated they string in a whole and also there are new complate and +50% > > languages. > > Is planed to update

Re: [aur-general] [Aur4] translations in transifex

2015-05-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, 28 May 2015 at 23:13:33, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote: > I noticed that aur4 have some new strings but the transifex page has not > pudated they string in a whole and also there are new complate and +50% > languages. > Is planed to update the transifex sometime soon? and the lang selector in >

Re: [aur-general] How to update .SRCINFO without creating a tarball?

2015-05-28 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Thu, 28 May 2015 at 11:49:07, Νῖκος Θεοδώρου wrote: > [...] > Since you're at it, why don't you make the "git push" part a bit > clearer, since many of us are unfamiliar with git? Ie, you could put > the steps like that: > 1. Create a new (empty) package base foobar, run the following command: >

[aur-general] [Aur4] translations in transifex

2015-05-28 Thread Pablo Lezaeta Reyes
I noticed that aur4 have some new strings but the transifex page has not pudated they string in a whole and also there are new complate and +50% languages. Is planed to update the transifex sometime soon? and the lang selector in home page of aur now will use the native name instead of ca_CA or fo_

Re: [aur-general] How to update .SRCINFO without creating a tarball?

2015-05-28 Thread Νῖκος Θεοδώρου
On Thu, 28 May 2015 13:34:35 +0200 Marcel Korpel wrote: > * Νῖκος Θεοδώρου (Thu, 28 May 2015 14:23:41 > +0300): > > I mean, isn't .gitignore an unnecessary complication? No one will > > want to keep src/ and pkg/ etc after they are done anyway. Since > > they will delete them after (e), they mi

Re: [aur-general] How to update .SRCINFO without creating a tarball?

2015-05-28 Thread Marcel Korpel
* Νῖκος Θεοδώρου (Thu, 28 May 2015 14:23:41 +0300): > On Thu, 28 May 2015 13:14:11 +0200 > Marcel Korpel wrote: > >> I think we should wait until [1] gets merged into that project: then >> that file could serve as a default .gitignore file for future AUR >> packages. > > Wouldn't it be just eas

Re: [aur-general] How to update .SRCINFO without creating a tarball?

2015-05-28 Thread Marcel Korpel
* Marcel Korpel (Thu, 28 May 2015 13:14:11 +0200): > At this point, a default .gitignore should be placed in . One more addition: in case of a package that downloads from VCS sources, the download directory created by makepkg (containing the source tree) should be added to .gitignore. For instanc

Re: [aur-general] How to update .SRCINFO without creating a tarball?

2015-05-28 Thread Νῖκος Θεοδώρου
On Thu, 28 May 2015 13:14:11 +0200 Marcel Korpel wrote: > I think we should wait until [1] gets merged into that project: then > that file could serve as a default .gitignore file for future AUR > packages. Wouldn't it be just easier to recommend that one a) edit the PKGBUILD b) run makepkg -g a

Re: [aur-general] How to update .SRCINFO without creating a tarball?

2015-05-28 Thread Marcel Korpel
* Νῖκος Θεοδώρου (Thu, 28 May 2015 12:49:07 +0300): > Since you're at it, why don't you make the "git push" part a bit > clearer, since many of us are unfamiliar with git? Good point, but we'll also have to add a default .gitignore file, otherwise everything in src/ and pkg/ and all downloaded fi

Re: [aur-general] How to update .SRCINFO without creating a tarball?

2015-05-28 Thread Νῖκος Θεοδώρου
On Thu, 28 May 2015 01:24:38 +0200 Marcel Korpel wrote: > I understand, and I edited the wiki a bit: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Submitting_packages_to_aur4.archlinux.org > > Best, Marcel Since you're at it, why don't you make the "git push" part a bit clearer, s

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2015-05-28 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days