>
> 1. Yes, I do have network access outside of my corporate environment.
> However, much (READ: all) of the project maintenance and code lives on and
> is performed on my corporate servers.
>
> 2. I currently maintain the ownCloud-beta-client package as part of my
> involvement with that group.
>
Em 17-06-2015 22:24, Damian Nowak escreveu:
...or even hotels.
Ok. I can provide nginx, openssh and sshlp configuration to the AUR
maintainers if that's what you guys want. I bet that they already know
how to implement this anyway. But I still believe it's a dumb idea. Much
better to implement
> I'm not requiring that others solve my problem, Giancarlo.
> As mentioned, this is an impossibility in our organization, and (I'm sure)
> many others.
...or even hotels.
Damian.
On 17/06, f3bruary wrote:
Hello all
I registered a while ago on aur.archlinux.org (5/27/2015 3:23 pm) under
the username 'f3bruary' and using this email account
(f3bru...@protonmail.ch).
I received the welcome email with the activation link which took me to
the page where I had to confirm m
You're a bit late, why not call yourself "june"?
Hello all
I registered a while ago on aur.archlinux.org (5/27/2015 3:23 pm) under the
username 'f3bruary' and using this email account (f3bru...@protonmail.ch).
I received the welcome email with the activation link which took me to the page
where I had to confirm my email address and choose a
Em 17-06-2015 15:51, LoneVVolf escreveu:
sofar many people have responded, but 1 name is missing : Lukas
Fleischer, our valued aur web maintainer.
I suggest you create a feature request for AUR git over https support
at https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2 .
There is already support f
On 17-06-15 14:17, Tom Swartz wrote:
Asking for a response from the OP: Do you not have other network access
available to maintain your AUR packages? More to the point, are you
maintaining packages on AUR as part of your official responsibilities? Or
just in spare time? Leaving aside, for the mom
Giancarlo,
>This is stupid, as I already pointed.
The amount of neckbearding arguments you have posted here are not
productive.
Despite how 'stupid' the decisions are, either in your opinion or in fact,
repeatedly pointing it out has no bearing on the fact that it exists.
> I'm complaining with
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Tom Swartz wrote:
>
> To answer your questions:
>
> 1. Yes, I do have network access outside of my corporate environment.
> However, much (READ: all) of the project maintenance and code lives on and
> is performed on my corporate servers.
>
> 2. I currently maintai
>Asking for a response from the OP: Do you not have other network access
>available to maintain your AUR packages? More to the point, are you
>maintaining packages on AUR as part of your official responsibilities? Or
>just in spare time? Leaving aside, for the moment, all other arguments
>regarding
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 1 new package in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 156 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 days
12 matches
Mail list logo
