Em 18-06-2015 19:27, LoneVVolf escreveu:
Should we allow such programs in AUR ?
You're mistaking a tool for its uses. I have some packages on the AUR
that could also help protect criminals. Should I also remove these
packages from AUR? Let's ban criptography, because it also protect
criminals.
As one of the maintainers of one of the hashcat packages, I am a firm believer
that such programs should be allowed. They are not illegal, have plenty of
legal and moral use cases and are widely available elsewhere (why put a
non-universal constraint on a single set of programs with virtually no
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:38:29 -0700, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:27:14 +0200 LoneVVolf
>wrote:
>> I realise it and can be useful for people that forgot their own
>> password, there are many illegal/immoral uses for it.
>
>It's useful not just for forgotten passwords,
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:27:14 +0200 LoneVVolf wrote:
> I realise it and can be useful for people that forgot their own
> password, there are many illegal/immoral uses for it.
It's useful not just for forgotten passwords, but for
penetration/security testing as well as theoretical purposes.
> Sh
Hi,
While browsing AUR4 orphaned pacakges, i noticed cudahashcat with
description "Worlds fastest password cracker with dictionary mutation
engine" .
There are atleast 2 more packages from the same upstream,
http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/ .
I realise it and can be useful for people that fo
On 14/06/15 09:03 AM, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:01:45 +0200 Lukas Fleischer
> wrote:
>> We cannot merge comments easily as there would be conflicts with
>> comments added on aur4.archlinux.org in the meantime.
> Why would there be conflicts merging the comments? Not that I k
On 12/06/15 07:45 AM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Therning
> wrote:
>> No, and valuable != popular :)
>>
>> Any popularity contest is going to be biased in some way. This is as
>> good a bias as any other.
>>
> And let's leave completely out of focus that the bia
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 156 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 day
