Might be irreverent to this topic, but we ArchlinuxCN community have this
tool `nvchecker`[1]
that can check updates of version numbers for packages.
It currently have support for pulling version infomation from aur4/aur,
github, pypi, and many other upsteam sources.
It records the current versio
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Justin Dray wrote:
> Because that would only work for the current version, and back one, this
> way you could see the relevant change happening after an issue is reported
> and such. It seems like a much easier way to view the differences to me at
> least.
>
> - J
Why not just check the last updated date?
-- Eli Schwartz
Because that would only work for the current version, and back one, this
way you could see the relevant change happening after an issue is reported
and such. It seems like a much easier way to view the differences to me at
least.
- Just
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Justin Dray wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking it could be useful to show in comments when a new version is
> pushed by the maintainer of a package; just a line break and maybe v1 -> v2
> or the git commit message or something. It would be easier to make sense of
> c
Hi,
I was thinking it could be useful to show in comments when a new version is
pushed by the maintainer of a package; just a line break and maybe v1 -> v2
or the git commit message or something. It would be easier to make sense of
comments on many of the packages I've seen and allow us to see if
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bruno Pagani
wrote:
> I’m not sure to understand you. How would you package this one for
> instance:
>
> https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-pepper-flash-standalone/
>
> ?
>
> Bruno
>
See this diff: http://pastebin.com/EggVuYpH
-- Eli Schwartz
Il 21/06/2015 21:30, carstene1ns ha scritto:
tl;dr:
Here[1] is a working patch.
...
Hope this helps.
best regards,
carstene1ns
It really helped! The build went fine for x86_64, now I'm testing i686
build. Thank you very much!
I'll put proper credits in the patch :)
--
Giovanni Santini
My
Le 14/06/2015 16:31, Johannes Löthberg a écrit :
> On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
>> On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
instead of actually using properly structured and supported features.
>>>
>>> Please take this not-a-bu
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:17:35 +0200, Giovanni Santini wrote:
>There should already be a git repository with all AUR PKGBUILDs, if
>I'm not wrong.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aur-git/
* Giovanni Santini (Mon, 22 Jun 2015
21:17:35 +0200):
> As in title, I just want to know if the PKGBUILDs of AUR3 will be
> deleted or kept somewhere.
Yes, there will be a read-only site for AUR3 packages.
> There should already be a git repository with all AUR PKGBUILDs, if
> I'm not wrong.
h
Hello everybody,
As in title, I just want to know if the PKGBUILDs of AUR3 will be
deleted or kept somewhere.
There should already be a git repository with all AUR PKGBUILDs, if I'm
not wrong.
I'm asking so in case I miss some old packages I can update them and
push them to AUR4 :)
--
Giovann
I’m trying to create a shallow clone of an AURv4 repository with
`--depth 1`, but I can’t get it to work.
$ git clone https://aur4.archlinux.org/pkgbuilder.git/
Cloning into 'pkgbuilder'...
remote: Counting objects: 23, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (17/17), done.
remote: Total 23 (delta
I think that is reasonable, I will create a new package on the aur4
called libvterm-vwm and will open a merge request and let the other
package be named libvterm.
Mark Weiman (markzz)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am 22.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Johannes Dewender:
> http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/libvterm/ by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
> is the "original" libvterm from 2007 [1] (Copyright 2008 in LICENSE).
> There is a Launchpad project [2] and also a GitHub mirror [2] as part of
> the NeoVim project.
> The last co
Am 22.06.2015 um 15:32 schrieb Mark Weiman:
> I was contacted by maintainer fwalch and he wants to submit a package
> that is named libvterm and is from this site (
> http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/libvterm/) and is concerned with how he
> should name it and how my package libvterm (
> https://aur4
I was contacted by maintainer fwalch and he wants to submit a package
that is named libvterm and is from this site (
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/libvterm/) and is concerned with how he
should name it and how my package libvterm (
https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/libvterm/) should be named.
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 2 fully signed off packages
* 175 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14 day
17 matches
Mail list logo
