=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 157 packages missing signoffs
* 2 packages older than 14
Le 25/06/2015 14:26, Ralf Mardorf a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:18:49 +0200, Bruno Pagani wrote:
The best option would be to get ride of i686. :p
Likely an issue for Arch Linux freaks in Third World nations. Btw. I'm
from Germany and still own a
PS: I guess I still own an unused PC with a Cyrix CPU. Taking a look at
the Wiki, it might be that even this Cyrix CPU could belong to the 486
CPUs. My Atari ST has got parallel to the 68000 CPU a 80286 CPU, but I
only run TOS and similar and DR DOS on that machine, not Linux ;).
Am 25.06.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Νῖκος Θεοδώρου:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:58:30 +0200
Johannes Dewender a...@jonnyjd.net wrote:
Am 24.06.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Bartłomiej Piotrowski:
The [extra] package is always set to some particular commit from
stable branch.
Well, yes. The AUR package
Do this:
source_i686=(http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz;)
md5sums_i686=('ffeeddccbbaa99887766554433221100')
source_x86_64=(http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-x86_64.tar.gz;)
md5sums_x86_64=('00112233445566778899aabbccddeeff')
package() {
local tarball=${source_i686[0]}
[
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:58:30 +0200
Johannes Dewender a...@jonnyjd.net wrote:
Am 24.06.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Bartłomiej Piotrowski:
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:00:14 +0300
Νῖκος Θεοδώρου ntheo1...@gmail.com wrote:
Then they only kept git (master and stable). The [extra]
package [1] pulls from
Le 23/06/2015 01:02, Eli Schwartz a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bruno Pagani bruno.pag...@ens-lyon.org
wrote:
I’m not sure to understand you. How would you package this one for
instance:
https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-pepper-flash-standalone/
?
Bruno
See
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:18:49 +0200, Bruno Pagani wrote:
The best option would be to get ride of i686. :p
Likely an issue for Arch Linux freaks in Third World nations. Btw. I'm
from Germany and still own a
fall-back-you-never-know-32-bit-architecture-mobo. Even my 64-bit
architecture computer
Le 25/06/2015 13:26, Martti Kühne a écrit :
Do this:
source_i686=(http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz;)
md5sums_i686=('ffeeddccbbaa99887766554433221100')
source_x86_64=(http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-x86_64.tar.gz;)
md5sums_x86_64=('00112233445566778899aabbccddeeff')
2015-06-24 21:17 GMT-03:00 Mark Weiman mark.wei...@markzz.com:
What is the push command you are using?
Mark Weiman
I am using the one at Arch Wiki [1]
$ mksrcinfo
$ git add PKGBUILD .SRCINFO
$ git commit -m 'Initial import'
$ git push origin master
I am supposing that
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:17:49 +0100 Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25-06-2015 12:26, Martti Kühne wrote:
Do this:
source_i686=(http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz;)
md5sums_i686=('ffeeddccbbaa99887766554433221100')
On 25-06-2015 12:26, Martti Kühne wrote:
Do this:
source_i686=(http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz;)
md5sums_i686=('ffeeddccbbaa99887766554433221100')
source_x86_64=(http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-x86_64.tar.gz;)
md5sums_x86_64=('00112233445566778899aabbccddeeff')
On 25/06, Patrick Burroughs wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:17:49 +0100 Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't just
local tarball=${source_$CARCH[0]}
or something very similar do the job?
I believe you need:
local tarball=$(eval echo \${source_${CARCH}[0]})
Why do you
On 25/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
However, AFAIK Ubuntu does not provide i386, even if the packages should
be named like that, IIRC they only provide i486, so the time will come
when even i686 is history.
Linux does not have support for i386 anymore.
--
Sincerely,
Johannes Löthberg
PGP Key ID:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:15:01 -0300
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@barrera.io wrote:
Why not just name them the same locally?
source_i686=($pkgname-$pkgver::
http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz;)
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015, at 08:26, Martti Kühne wrote:
Do this:
source_i686=(http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz;)
md5sums_i686=('ffeeddccbbaa99887766554433221100')
source_x86_64=(http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-x86_64.tar.gz;)
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Bruno Pagani bruno.pag...@ens-lyon.org
wrote:
Le 14/06/2015 16:31, Johannes Löthberg a écrit :
On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 14/06, Reventlov wrote:
In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack
instead of actually using
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:01:02 +0200 Johannes Löthberg
johan...@kyriasis.com wrote:
On 25/06, Patrick Burroughs wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:17:49 +0100 Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't just
local tarball=${source_$CARCH[0]}
or something very similar do the job?
2015-06-25 13:42 GMT-03:00 Mark Weiman mark.wei...@markzz.com:
What I am seeing on AUR3 is that you are the maintainer of python2
-sievelib and python2-rrdtool. Are you sure that you mean those
packages rather than python-sievelib and python-rrdtool?
I would also take out the python 3 parts
On 25/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:00:13 +0200, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 25/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
However, AFAIK Ubuntu does not provide i386, even if the packages
should be named like that, IIRC they only provide i486, so the time
will come when even i686 is history.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Patrick Burroughs ce...@celti.name
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:01:02 +0200 Johannes Löthberg
johan...@kyriasis.com wrote:
On 25/06, Patrick Burroughs wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:17:49 +0100 Mauro Santos
registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:00:13 +0200, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 25/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
However, AFAIK Ubuntu does not provide i386, even if the packages
should be named like that, IIRC they only provide i486, so the time
will come when even i686 is history.
Linux does not have support for
What I am seeing on AUR3 is that you are the maintainer of python2
-sievelib and python2-rrdtool. Are you sure that you mean those
packages rather than python-sievelib and python-rrdtool?
I would also take out the python 3 parts of the package because they
don't seem to be necessary.
Mark
On 25/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 19:20:30 +0200, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 25/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:00:13 +0200, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 25/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
However, AFAIK Ubuntu does not provide i386, even if the packages
should be
On 25-06-2015 18:07, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote:
A quick google and some personal testing showed me that the former
doesn't work and the latter does, because bash doesn't interpolate
variables in the middle of another variable like that; you need to use
eval to make a second pass for it
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 19:20:30 +0200, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 25/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:00:13 +0200, Johannes Löthberg wrote:
On 25/06, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
However, AFAIK Ubuntu does not provide i386, even if the packages
should be named like that, IIRC they only provide
Sorry, I didn't follow the whole thread, so perhaps this is useless,
but maybe not:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pa/palemoon-bin/PKGBUILD
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:40:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Sorry, I didn't follow the whole thread, so perhaps this is useless,
but maybe not:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pa/palemoon-bin/PKGBUILD
My apologies, now I read the whole thread. I should have done it before
sending my mail.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015, at 12:50, Maxime Gauduin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:15:01 -0300
Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@barrera.io wrote:
Why not just name them the same locally?
29 matches
Mail list logo
