Re: [aur-general] AUR4 keywords in PKGBUILD?

2015-07-17 Thread Johannes Löthberg
On 14/07, David Phillips wrote: I wouldn't say having keywords in the .SRCINFO is any better than having it in the PKGBUILD. SRCINFOs contain metadata drawn directly from the PKGBUILD, with the exception of things like the `epoch` field. To have the keywords present in the SRCINFO but not the

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2015-07-17 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 34 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Unsure whether to adopt, wait for maintainer to re-upload, and/or merge packages

2015-07-17 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 15-07-2015 13:45, ShadowKyogre escreveu: Decided to email the submitter yesterday. Should I wait for a response for about a week? I don't think there are any hard rules on that. I mailed him on a Friday. If I didn't got a response, by Monday I'd took over the package. Truth be told, they

Re: [aur-general] AUR4 keywords in PKGBUILD?

2015-07-17 Thread David Phillips
I'm aware of that and I hope I didn't imply otherwise. The point I was trying to get at is that .SRCINFOs are summaries of a package's metadata. I understand that keywords are metadata so if they had to be put somewhere, it would make sense to put them in .SRCINFOs. However (assuming we refuse to

Re: [aur-general] AUR4 keywords in PKGBUILD?

2015-07-17 Thread Marcel Korpel
* David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com (Sat, 18 Jul 2015 10:25:43 +1200): I suppose if mksrcinfo left the proposed keyword field alone but updated the rest of the file, it might be a tidier solution… I'm confused: do you want to say that you want a human to fill in keywords in .SRCINFO and let

Re: [aur-general] Package merge on aur4

2015-07-17 Thread DJ Lucas
On 07/17/2015 08:29 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: Hi, I am adopting the sogo package, and already had the sogo-openchange and sogo-activesync packages. Nothing has been pushed in sogo-openchange nor sogo-activesync (nor sogo yet, though commit is ready to push). I'll be merging these three packages

[aur-general] Package merge on aur4

2015-07-17 Thread DJ Lucas
Hi, I am adopting the sogo package, and already had the sogo-openchange and sogo-activesync packages. Nothing has been pushed in sogo-openchange nor sogo-activesync (nor sogo yet, though commit is ready to push). I'll be merging these three packages into a single split package. When trying to