=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 14 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 30 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14
Hi everyone,
I (nickname farseerfc) would like to apply as a Trusted User.
Felix Yan (felixonmars) will be my sponsor.
Some basic information about myself,
My name is Jiachen Yang (楊嘉晨). I am 27 years old.
I grown up in Shanghai, China, and I am living in Osaka, Japan.
I am a PhD student major
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 04/11/2015 17:50, Doug Newgard a écrit :
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:43:31 +0100 Ole Jon Bjørkum
> wrote:
>
> If they can't figure out that AUR packages may depend on other AUR
> packages, they really have no business running Arch.
On 11/05/2015 06:16 PM, Jiachen Yang wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I (nickname farseerfc) would like to apply as a Trusted User.
> Felix Yan (felixonmars) will be my sponsor.
>
> Some basic information about myself,
> My name is Jiachen Yang (楊嘉晨). I am 27 years old.
> I grown up in Shanghai, China,
* Félix Piédallu [2015-11-05 11:15:46 +0100]:
> Le 04/11/2015 17:50, Doug Newgard a écrit :
> > On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:43:31 +0100 Ole Jon Bjørkum
> > wrote:
> >
> > If they can't figure out that AUR packages may depend on other AUR
> > packages, they really
On 05/11/15 11:15, Félix Piédallu wrote:
> Le 04/11/2015 17:50, Doug Newgard a écrit :
>> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:43:31 +0100 Ole Jon Bjørkum
>> wrote:
>
>> If they can't figure out that AUR packages may depend on other AUR
>> packages, they really have no business running Arch.
>
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:15:46 +0100, Félix Piédallu wrote:
>> If they can't figure out that AUR packages may depend on other AUR
>> packages, they really have no business running Arch.
>>
>That's not how Linux will become user-friendly.
It's not Arch's policy to make Linux user-friendly.
Just out of curiousity: why are you maintaining awesome34?
Is there something that got lost on the way to 3.5?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
On 11/06/2015 04:38 AM, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Just out of curiousity: why are you maintaining awesome34?
> Is there something that got lost on the way to 3.5?
>
Short answer: Yes, the upstream of awesome 3.5 dropped the support for
multiple screens (in X protocol term, not the general