Re: [aur-general] pkgbuild - suggestion

Arch Linux CN community have a tool nvchecker ( https://github.com/lilydjwg/nvchecker) for periodically checking new versions of software and sending notifications. We have a nightly building bot and a unofficial repo ( https://github.com/archlinuxcn/repo) driving by nvchecker. On Thu, Feb 18,

Re: [aur-general] pkgbuild - suggestion

* Eli Schwartz [2016-02-17 19:50:40 -0500]: > On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Jozef Riha wrote: > > hello, > > > > this might not be a perfect place to propose new things to pkgbuild but > > otoh it does affect pkgbuild and does make sense for aur packages. my point > > is: at the

Re: [aur-general] pkgbuild - suggestion

On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Jozef Riha wrote: > hello, > > this might not be a perfect place to propose new things to pkgbuild but > otoh it does affect pkgbuild and does make sense for aur packages. my point > is: at the moment the only way that the aur maintainers learn about > upstream version

Re: [aur-general] pkgbuild - suggestion

Le 17 février 2016 23:11:03 GMT+01:00, Jozef Riha a écrit : >hello, > >this might not be a perfect place to propose new things to pkgbuild but >otoh it does affect pkgbuild and does make sense for aur packages. my >point >is: at the moment the only way that the aur

Re: [aur-general] pkgbuild - suggestion

Hi, Le 17/02/2016 23:11, Jozef Riha a écrit : > hello, > > this might not be a perfect place to propose new things to pkgbuild but > otoh it does affect pkgbuild and does make sense for aur packages. my point > is: at the moment the only way that the aur maintainers learn about > upstream version

[aur-general] pkgbuild - suggestion

hello, this might not be a perfect place to propose new things to pkgbuild but otoh it does affect pkgbuild and does make sense for aur packages. my point is: at the moment the only way that the aur maintainers learn about upstream version bump is either by a user notification system (flags on

Re: [aur-general] Moderator/admin please help: Misuse of AUR (yaourt) comments

* Ralf Mardorf [2016-02-17 21:38:31 +0100]: > Hi, > > could a moderator/admin please leave a note at > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yaourt/?comments=all ? > > If we didn't laugh, we would cry. > > Several AUR users neither care about the text and links of the

Re: [aur-general] Moderator/admin please help: Misuse of AUR (yaourt) comments

> Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:38 PM +01:00 from Ralf Mardorf > : > > Several AUR users neither care about the text and links of the first box > at https://aur.archlinux.org/ , nor do they read the already provided > comments. This is AUR. Not all AUR users - you

Re: [aur-general] Moderator/admin please help: Misuse of AUR (yaourt) comments

I'm sure nobody cares, but anyone mentioning that so-called AUR helper that pronounces closely enough to rotten milk belongs banned off either AUR or this mailing list. Seriously, this has been going on too long and I want to see the moderators and devs acknowledge that the time to move on has

[aur-general] Moderator/admin please help: Misuse of AUR (yaourt) comments

Hi, could a moderator/admin please leave a note at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yaourt/?comments=all ? If we didn't laugh, we would cry. Several AUR users neither care about the text and links of the first box at https://aur.archlinux.org/ , nor do they read the already provided comments.

Re: [aur-general] bringing vis to [community]

Connor Behan on Wed, 2016/02/17 12:46: > On 17/02/16 12:09 PM, Christian Hesse wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > vis aims to be a modern, legacy free, simple yet efficient vim-like > > editor. > > > > That is what the readme says... I think this is a pretty good

Re: [aur-general] bringing vis to [community]

On 17/02/16 12:09 PM, Christian Hesse wrote: > Hello everybody, > > vis aims to be a modern, legacy free, simple yet efficient vim-like > editor. > > That is what the readme says... I think this is a pretty good description. > As there is good documentation I suggest taking a look at the readme

[aur-general] bringing vis to [community]

Hello everybody, vis aims to be a modern, legacy free, simple yet efficient vim-like editor. That is what the readme says... I think this is a pretty good description. As there is good documentation I suggest taking a look at the readme [0] for anybody interested. Looks like vis is still

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 27 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14