I'm the maintainer of the following packages on AUR. They've been added to
[community] so the AUR ones should be deleted now.
idris
haskell-annotated-wl-pprint
haskell-charset
haskell-cheapskate
haskell-fingertree
haskell-language-javascript
haskell-libffi
haskell-parsers
haskell-reducers
On 03/02/2016 11:58 PM, Dustin Falgout wrote:
>> To: aur-general@archlinux.org> From: anthr...@archlinux.org
>> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:48:27 +0100
>> Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout
>>
>> On 03/02/2016 09:19 PM, Balló György wrote:
>>> If you don't specify tag or
2016-02-28 16:02 GMT-05:00 Dustin Falgout :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> My name is Dustin Falgout (aka lots0logs) and this is my application to
> join the Arch Linux project as a Trusted User.
>
> About Me:
>
> I'm 29 years old. I
Il 05/03/2016 19:20, iamjacksem...@hackermail.com ha scritto:
>> As explained by mail, I don't consider this software suitable to submit in
>> the AUR.
>
>> 1) the package is poorly written (see AUR guidelines for packaging[1])
> How so? I moved the tar.gz to ninjaos.org. The package complies
>As explained by mail, I don't consider this software suitable to submit in the
>AUR.
>1) the package is poorly written (see AUR guidelines for packaging[1])
How so? I moved the tar.gz to ninjaos.org. The package complies with
specifications.
2) the software itself is _really_ poorly written
Hi All,
while searching for Bacula (http://www.bacula.org) in AUR I found two
conflicting packages: bacula, version 7.2.0-2, maintained by maleckii,
and bacula-client, version 7.4.0-1, maintained by eworm. At a quick
glance it looks like bacula-client provides bacula-fd binary package
from bacula
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 256 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 266 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14