On 23.07.2016 20:58, keenerd via aur-general wrote:
> On 7/23/16, Nicola Squartini via aur-general
> wrote:
>> in fact, back in May I posted a patch for namcap
>> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2016-May/004346.html
>
> Sorry I missed that one. That chunk of code was refacto
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 27 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
Evolution shows "Good signature" to me.
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 09:00 +0530, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general
wrote:
> Don't want to sound picky, but it seems like the PGP signature of your e-mail
> is
wrong :p
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 05:51:52PM +0900, Nicola Squartini via aur-general
wrote:
> Evolution shows "Good signature" to me.
>
> On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 09:00 +0530, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general
> wrote:
> > Don't want to sound picky, but it seems like the PGP signature of your
> > e-mail is
>
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:51:52 +0900
Nicola Squartini via aur-general wrote:
> Evolution shows "Good signature" to me.
>
> On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 09:00 +0530, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general
> wrote:
> > Don't want to sound picky, but it seems like the PGP signature of
> > your e-mail is
> wrong
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 02:28 -0700, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:51:52 +0900
> > Nicola Squartini via aur-general wrote:
>
> > Evolution shows "Good signature" to me.
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 09:00 +0530, Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general
> > wrote:
> > > Don't wa
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 02:28:24 -0700
"Patrick Burroughs (Celti)" wrote:
> Your message fails verification here, too, both using claws-mail's
> PGP/MIME plugin and downloading the raw message and verifying it using
> gpg on the command line. Have you tried manually verifying your own
> message yourse
On 07/24/2016 01:29 PM, Nicola Squartini via aur-general wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 02:28:24 -0700
> "Patrick Burroughs (Celti)" wrote:
>> Your message fails verification here, too, both using claws-mail's
>> PGP/MIME plugin and downloading the raw message and verifying it using
>> gpg on the co
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 20:29:46 +0900
Nicola Squartini via aur-general wrote:
> I'm using claws-mail now, and it verifies my signature. Can you tell
> me if this email if verified?
Yep, have a good signature for this one both from Claws and on the
command line. I'm curious as to what Evolution was d
Hi Nicola,
sounds great to get atom/electron into [community].
On 07/23/2016 06:39 AM, Nicola Squartini via aur-general wrote:
> When I first started using Atom, I didn't like the fact that the
> official installation procedure would push precompiled stuff into my
> system: as every old school Li
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 05:23 -0700, Patrick Burroughs (Celti) wrote:
> perhaps it was sending both HTML and plaintext, signing the wrong
> one,
> and then mailman stripped the HTML (ruining the signature) once it
> was
> sent?
>
> ~Celti
I was indeed sending both (I disabled HTML now), and it was
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 14:30 +0200, Levente Polyak wrote:
> Hi Nicola,
>
> sounds great to get atom/electron into [community].
>
> On 07/23/2016 06:39 AM, Nicola Squartini via aur-general wrote:
> >
> > When I first started using Atom, I didn't like the fact that the
> > official installation pro
12 matches
Mail list logo
