Re: [aur-general] PKGBULD validation

2016-09-08 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 09/08/2016 01:01 PM, Patrick Ziegler via aur-general wrote: > v8 also adds a header w/ a timestamp so you cannot run mksrcinfo on > every commit, you have to actively check that PKGBUILD was changed, > but the *-git does not do that anymore so it really doesn't matter for > me. True. And there

Re: [aur-general] PKGBULD validation

2016-09-08 Thread Patrick Ziegler via aur-general
2016-09-08 16:23 GMT+02:00 Eli Schwartz via aur-general : > The hook existed before makepkg gained a --printsrcinfo flag, otherwise > there is no real difference. I never changed it after pacman 5.0 was > released. Yeah I figured something like that would be the case.

Re: [aur-general] mantisbt blacklisted?

2016-09-08 Thread David Runge
> Did it used to be in community? Because it isn't in the repos, but it is Yes. > in the svntogit archive. (And if it was dropped from the repos, I > thought the branch was supposed to be dropped.) I see. Alucryd moved it to the AUR: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50206 I adopted it afterwards

Re: [aur-general] mantisbt blacklisted?

2016-09-08 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 09/08/2016 10:26 AM, David Runge wrote: > Helloes everyone, > > I was just trying to push a new version of mantisbt (1.3.1), which I > adopted from alucryd. > > However, I get this odd message: > > remote: error: package is blacklisted: mantisbt > remote: error: hook declined to update

[aur-general] mantisbt blacklisted?

2016-09-08 Thread David Runge
Helloes everyone, I was just trying to push a new version of mantisbt (1.3.1), which I adopted from alucryd. However, I get this odd message: remote: error: package is blacklisted: mantisbt remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master To aur.archlinux.org:mantisbt ! [remote

Re: [aur-general] PKGBULD validation

2016-09-08 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 09/08/2016 07:49 AM, Patrick Ziegler via aur-general wrote: > I was actually looking at this yesterday, didn't realize it was from > you though. I was only looking at the pre-commit hook but the other > stuff looks really cool too, I will probably start using it. I have > one question though,

Re: [aur-general] PKGBULD validation

2016-09-08 Thread Bruno Pagani
Le 08/09/2016 à 13:49, Patrick Ziegler via aur-general a écrit : > 2016-09-08 2:42 GMT+02:00 Eli Schwartz via aur-general > : >> If you do do something with pre-commit hooks, make sure to check out my >> setup at https://github.com/eli-schwartz/pkgbuilds > I was

Re: [aur-general] PKGBULD validation

2016-09-08 Thread Patrick Ziegler via aur-general
2016-09-08 2:42 GMT+02:00 Eli Schwartz via aur-general : > > If you do do something with pre-commit hooks, make sure to check out my > setup at https://github.com/eli-schwartz/pkgbuilds I was actually looking at this yesterday, didn't realize it was from you though. I

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2016-09-08 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 135 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14

Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood

2016-09-08 Thread Maxime Gauduin
The discussion period is now over, please cast your votes over on AUR. Cheers, September 3 2016 9:19 PM, "Maxime Gauduin" wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I confirm my sponsorship of this guy. > > @Doug: I agree that lying