Re: [aur-general] Handling of virtual packages

2016-09-20 Thread Pedro A . López-Valencia via aur-general
On 20/09/2016 3:12 p. m., buckket wrote: > Hey, > > I’m currently maintaining serval packages on the AUR which are all > implementations of djb’s redo[0], an incremental build system. However > there are minor differences between all those implementations, and as > djb never wrote one himself the

[aur-general] Handling of virtual packages

2016-09-20 Thread buckket
Hey, I’m currently maintaining serval packages on the AUR which are all implementations of djb’s redo[0], an incremental build system. However there are minor differences between all those implementations, and as djb never wrote one himself there is no "offical" one. That’s why I decided to give t

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]

2016-09-20 Thread Arch Website Notification
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 16 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days