On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:19:10AM +0200, Martin Kühne via aur-general wrote:
>
> It is also a good idea to use conflicts=() to prevent packages from
> providing the same thing from being installed.
I'd clarify this by saying that if two packages have conflicting files,
pacman will still not allo
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 5 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 1 fully signed off package
* 20 packages missing signoffs
* 8 packages older than 14 days
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:12 PM, buckket wrote:
> As there some programs out there which use redo’s .do files in their
> building process it’s important that they can specify redo, or any of
> the existing implementations in their makedepends. But as far as I know
> there is no way to specify eit
