Re: [aur-general] [review-request] python-intelhex

2017-01-23 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 01/23/2017 08:42 PM, Quentin Bourgeois wrote: > Thus, I decide to have a look at the PKGBUILD and suggest some > modifications I guess the maintainer will be glad to merge any > proposal, but did the community see any thing more to change ? > Basically I made use a lot more of its internal

Re: [aur-general] [review-request] python-intelhex

2017-01-23 Thread Justin Dray
This would probably be best posted to the package page for the python2-intelhex package. The mailing list isn't really for issues with individual packages. FYI, removing the bin on python2 will be so that you can install both packages side-by-side without conflicts, but the python3 will be the

[aur-general] [review-request] python-intelhex

2017-01-23 Thread Quentin Bourgeois
Hi, I am currently looking for building python2-intelhex[0] from AUR. Unfortunately the build failed, while I am using aursync[1] and require build into a clean (created for this build) chroot: $ aursync -c python2-intelhex [...] ==> Starting package_python-intelhex()... /startdir/PKGBUILD: