Le 13/02/2017 à 17:03, brent timothy saner via aur-general a écrit :
> i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git
>
> THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED.
>
> They need to be separate packages. they are for different things.
>
> PRQ # is 7484
>
> Sorry for the confusion
Please note that PRQs hav
Le 14/02/2017 à 12:11, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
> Le 13/02/2017 à 17:03, brent timothy saner via aur-general a écrit :
>
>> i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git
>>
>> THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED.
>>
>> They need to be separate packages. they are for different things.
>>
>> PRQ # is 74
Dne 14.2.2017 v 12:14 Bruno Pagani via aur-general napsal(a):
> Le 14/02/2017 à 12:11, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
>
>> Le 13/02/2017 à 17:03, brent timothy saner via aur-general a écrit :
>>
>>> i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git
>>>
>>> THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED.
>>>
>>> They need t
Den 14-02-2017 kl. 12:19 skrev Daniel Milde:
> Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like
> python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git.
If the sources are in a Mercurial repository, the package should be -hg,
not -git. But speaking of python-hg... it points to
Dne 14.2.2017 v 14:50 Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen napsal(a):
> Den 14-02-2017 kl. 12:19 skrev Daniel Milde:
>> Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like
>> python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git.
> If the sources are in a Mercurial repository, the package s
On 02/14/2017 08:50 AM, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen wrote:
> Den 14-02-2017 kl. 12:19 skrev Daniel Milde:
>> Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like
>> python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git.
>
> If the sources are in a Mercurial repository, the package
Le 14/02/2017 à 14:56, Daniel Milde a écrit :
> Dne 14.2.2017 v 14:50 Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen napsal(a):
>> Den 14-02-2017 kl. 12:19 skrev Daniel Milde:
>>> Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like
>>> python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git.
>> If the
Le 03/01/2017 à 22:36, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit :
> On 01/03/2017 04:12 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
>> Thanks! That was very helpful!
>>
>> All applied, except... "--skip-build" - indeed it makes sense, but I
>> have never seen it with other Python packages. So I wonder if indeed it
>> is
On 02/14/2017 06:11 PM, Bruno Pagani wrote:
> Le 03/01/2017 à 22:36, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit :
>
>> On 01/03/2017 04:12 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
>>> Thanks! That was very helpful!
>>>
>>> All applied, except... "--skip-build" - indeed it makes sense, but I
>>> have never seen it with o
Le 15/02/2017 à 01:20, Eli Schwartz a écrit :
> On 02/14/2017 06:11 PM, Bruno Pagani wrote:
>> Le 03/01/2017 à 22:36, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit :
>>
>>> On 01/03/2017 04:12 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
Thanks! That was very helpful!
All applied, except... "--skip-build" - inde
On 02/14/2017 07:44 PM, Bruno Pagani wrote:
> So, if I understand things well, python{,2} setup.py build should do the
> same thing for most package, and any one of the two could be used to
> then package the two versions? So this would work:
> build() {
> python setup.py build
> }
> package_py
11 matches
Mail list logo