Hi,
I understand that users should decide on their own, if they wish to
install high risk vulnerable software, so I'm not writing because a
deletion request was rejected.
I want to make a suggestion.
A pinned comment could warn about the high security risk and
assuming that upstream of the origi
On 07/02/2017 03:09 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understand that users should decide on their own, if they wish to
> install high risk vulnerable software, so I'm not writing because a
> deletion request was rejected.
>
> I want to make a suggestion.
>
> A pinned comment could warn about
On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 03:49:10 -0400, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
>... That is entirely up to the maintainer of said package.
Hi,
yes and this shouldn't change. I just want to suggest to be responsible
and add a note.
>Even if it weren't entirely up to the maintainer to pin comments, who
>a
thanks.
The package author and I made some updates after you comments.
about checksums:
- I changed it for 'SKIP' rule
about version number:
- version tag has been added to original repository
- and the PKGBUILD grabs it
about the name:
- I added the '-git' suffix
- I updated the group name as
On 07/02/2017 09:48 AM, mickael foucaux via aur-general wrote:
> thanks.
>
> The package author and I made some updates after you comments.
>
> about checksums:
> - I changed it for 'SKIP' rule
>
> about version number:
> - version tag has been added to original repository
> - and the PKGBUILD g
thanks for the review. I'm grabbing as it your suggestion for the package
description
.
2017-07-02 16:21 GMT+01:00 Eli Schwartz via aur-general <
aur-general@archlinux.org>:
> On 07/02/2017 09:48 AM, mickael foucaux via aur-general wrote:
> > thanks.
> >
> > The package author and I made some upd
