Re: [aur-general] add base-devel / multilib-devel group as makedepend to AUR packages ?

2017-09-16 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 09/16/2017 08:19 AM, LoneVVolf wrote: > Hi, > > I do have the impression that the number of aur comments about pacakges > not building unless foo is installed has gone up. > Very often foo turns out to be part of base-devel or multilib-devel. > > Answering that is easy, by linking to main

Re: [aur-general] add base-devel / multilib-devel group as makedepend to AUR packages ?

2017-09-16 Thread brent s.
On 09/16/2017 08:36 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:19:56 -0400, brent s. wrote: >> We can automate everything else, why shouldn't we automate RTFMs? > > +1 but the robot should not only respond to stupid users, but also > react on idiotic maintainers after checking PKGBUILDs and

Re: [aur-general] add base-devel / multilib-devel group as makedepend to AUR packages ?

2017-09-16 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:19:56 -0400, brent s. wrote: >We can automate everything else, why shouldn't we automate RTFMs? +1 but the robot should not only respond to stupid users, but also react on idiotic maintainers after checking PKGBUILDs and scripts of the tarballs. All jesting aside, pin a

Re: [aur-general] add base-devel / multilib-devel group as makedepend to AUR packages ?

2017-09-16 Thread brent s.
On 09/16/2017 07:52 PM, David Phillips wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 02:19:09PM +0200, LoneVVolf wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I do have the impression that the number of aur comments about pacakges not >> building unless foo is installed has gone up. >> Very often foo turns out to be part of base-devel

Re: [aur-general] add base-devel / multilib-devel group as makedepend to AUR packages ?

2017-09-16 Thread David Phillips
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 02:19:09PM +0200, LoneVVolf wrote: > Hi, > > I do have the impression that the number of aur comments about pacakges not > building unless foo is installed has gone up. > Very often foo turns out to be part of base-devel or multilib-devel. > > Answering that is easy, by

Re: [aur-general] deletion of packages

2017-09-16 Thread Ricardo Band
On Sat, 2017-09-16 at 12:30 -0300, Rafael Fontenelle wrote: > 2017-09-16 11:58 GMT-03:00 Ricardo Band : > > Ahoi, > > > > I submitted a request to delete 2 of my packages a few days ago but > > nothing happened so far. > > > > I suggest waiting some more days. Recently I

Re: [aur-general] deletion of packages

2017-09-16 Thread Rafael Fontenelle
2017-09-16 11:58 GMT-03:00 Ricardo Band : > Ahoi, > > I submitted a request to delete 2 of my packages a few days ago but > nothing happened so far. > > The package yabat isn't develope dby me anymore. I deleted the upstream > repo so the package can also go away. > > The

[aur-general] deletion of packages

2017-09-16 Thread Ricardo Band
Ahoi, I submitted a request to delete 2 of my packages a few days ago but nothing happened so far. The package yabat isn't develope dby me anymore. I deleted the upstream repo so the package can also go away. The package python-virtualfish will be combined with python2-virtualfish once the

[aur-general] add base-devel / multilib-devel group as makedepend to AUR packages ?

2017-09-16 Thread LoneVVolf
Hi, I do have the impression that the number of aur comments about pacakges not building unless foo is installed has gone up. Very often foo turns out to be part of base-devel or multilib-devel. Answering that is easy, by linking to main AUR wiki page that clearly states base-devel is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Alad Wenter

2017-09-16 Thread Johannes Löthberg via aur-general
Quoting Johannes Löthberg (2017-09-10 15:24:15) > I confirm my sponsorship and such. Let the discussion period begin! > Discussion period has ended and the vote is up! https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=96 -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 PGP Key FP: 5134