On 01/17/2018 06:18 PM, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
> I'm no longer a TU so I can't see how active both speps and faidoc have
> been regarding participation in the votes. Yet the TU-Bylaws are pretty
> strict and given that Bluewind/Florian pointed out during the discussion
> period that both TUs had
On 18.01.2018 00.18, Thorsten Toepper via aur-general wrote:
> Therefore the second requirement, to NOT do any special action on the
> AUR requiring TU privileges is not fulfilled, as participating in
> votes is exactly one of these TU privileges.
This is unclear in the bylaws. I assumed that AUR
On 17.01.2018 19:51, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
> The voting is over. Results:
>
> Yes: 33
> No: 5
> Abstain: 5
>
> This means that speps is no longer a Trusted User.
>
> --
> György Balló
> Trusted User
>
I'm no longer a TU so I can't see how active both speps and faidoc have
been
The voting is over. Results:
Yes: 33
No: 5
Abstain: 5
This means that speps is no longer a Trusted User.
--
György Balló
Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
The voting is over. Results:
Yes: 31
No: 7
Abstain: 4
This means that faidoc is no longer a Trusted User.
--
György Balló
Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I don't think you need to be a programmer in order to maintain a package.
Don't adopt it unless you are willing to maintain it. If it's dated, then
flag it or adopt it and update it. As long as an package is out of date,
it's not a problem that it's orphaned really. It just means no one takes
