Re: [aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

2018-01-23 Thread DJ Lucas
On 01/23/2018 04:15 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: On January 23, 2018 3:59:24 PM CST, Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general wrote: Hello all This is my first attempt to create a valid PKGBUILD file for Arch Linux. It is about the missing amiwm window manager. Please tell me what you think # Maint

Re: [aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

2018-01-23 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 01/23/2018 04:59 PM, Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general wrote: > Hello all > > This is my first attempt to create a valid PKGBUILD file for Arch Linux. > It is about the missing amiwm window manager. > > Please tell me what you think In addition to the other comments, > package() { >

Re: [aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

2018-01-23 Thread DJ Lucas
On January 23, 2018 3:59:24 PM CST, Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general wrote: >Hello all > >This is my first attempt to create a valid PKGBUILD file for Arch >Linux. >It is about the missing amiwm window manager. > >Please tell me what you think > > > ># Maintainer: Panayotis Katsaloulis >pkg

Re: [aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

2018-01-23 Thread Michael Kogan
Looks good to me, the only minor thing coming to mind is: Maybe license=('custom') is better fitting the specification: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#license 2018-01-23 22:59 GMT+01:00 Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org>: > Hello all > > This is my

[aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

2018-01-23 Thread Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general
Hello all This is my first attempt to create a valid PKGBUILD file for Arch Linux. It is about the missing amiwm window manager. Please tell me what you think # Maintainer: Panayotis Katsaloulis pkgname=amiwm pkgver=0.21pl2 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="An X window manager that tries to make your display

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

2018-01-23 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 01/23/2018 02:16 PM, Balló György via aur-general wrote: >> Does anyone have any last-minute proposals to modify the wording for >> grammar etc. in the event that this is accepted? > > Sounds good for me. But how can we check if a TU modify a user account > or do anything other than resolving p

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

2018-01-23 Thread Balló György via aur-general
> Does anyone have any last-minute proposals to modify the wording for > grammar etc. in the event that this is accepted? Sounds good for me. But how can we check if a TU modify a user account or do anything other than resolving package requests (which is tracked on aur-requests mailing list)? Cur

Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

2018-01-23 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 01/18/2018 06:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the > Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" > > Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz > --- > > Handy link to context and surrounding discussion: > > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermai

Re: [aur-general] Moving xss-lock to community

2018-01-23 Thread Pierre Neidhardt via aur-general
Eli Schwartz via aur-general writes: > source=("https://bitbucket.org/raymonad/xss-lock/get/${_commit}.tar.gz";) No answer from the dev so far, so I've packaged the latest commit as Eli suggested. Let me know if there is anything wrong. -- Pierre Neidhardt The time spent on any item of the a