Re: [aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH] Clarify the process for Special Removal of an inactive TU

2018-01-24 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 01/23/2018 12:54 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 01/18/2018 06:18 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote: >> Not everything that is available only to an aurweb account of the >> Trusted User type, qualifies as a TU "privilege" >> >> Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz >> --- >> >> Handy link to context and surrounding di

Re: [aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

2018-01-24 Thread Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general
Exactly that's the reason. I tried to contact upstream and see how it goes. Στις Τετ, 24 Ιαν, 2018 at 1:44 ΜΜ, ο/η Eli Schwartz via aur-general έγραψε: > On 01/24/2018 05:32 AM, Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general wrote: >> Thank you for the comments. >> Indeed I didn't try to use "namcap"

Re: [aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

2018-01-24 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 01/24/2018 05:32 AM, Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general wrote: > Thank you for the comments. > Indeed I didn't try to use "namcap" to catch most of the comments. Now > I did and sorry about that. > > > Looking deeper at the resutls, I found another issue, which I don't > know which is the

Re: [aur-general] amiwm PKGBUILD file

2018-01-24 Thread Panayotis Katsaloulis via aur-general
Thank you for the comments. Indeed I didn't try to use "namcap" to catch most of the comments. Now I did and sorry about that. Looking deeper at the resutls, I found another issue, which I don't know which is the most appropriate method to fix it. Inside the produced package has references to