Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 04:15 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > I thought the idea here was to see what you are interested in, not what > I'm interested in. :p True, true. The packaging scene right now is both a blessing and a curse: very few packages exist that don't have a maintainer, but at the

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 05:04 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Turns out that since my application, Antonio Rojas has stepped up to the > plate and updated MATE to version 1.20.0, so props to him! The whole > group is still orphaned though, so I would plan on pushing out future > updates when they

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

El Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:04:24 -0600, Brad Fanella via aur-general escribió: > > Turns out that since my application, Antonio Rojas has stepped up to the > plate and updated MATE to version 1.20.0, so props to him! The whole > group is still orphaned though, so I would plan on pushing out future >

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 03:14 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Not as a general rule, no, but if the forum mods are feeling nice then > the forum software does allow it. :) > > Likewise, Bluewind can edit the bugtracker database. > > Perks of being friendly with the people in charge. :D Heh,

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 03:30 PM, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Per Eli's email, I have gone ahead and created a new AUR account under > the alias "cesura" (my standard nick for the past few years). For > clarity's sake, I've also made my bugtracker account under the same > name. Based on the BBS

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 06:52 AM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Brad, please create a new AUR account, as you will need one to interact > with the AUR for various TU duties if you are re-elected. (This is > independent of whether you maintain *any* packages in the AUR, which I > hope you will

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On 02/12/2018 04:36 AM, Christian Rebischke via aur-general wrote: > Hello everybody, > I kind of feel uncomfortable with this. I think that somebody who has > resigned, is not able to sign his mails and seems to ignore requests of > doing so, should apply over the normal way like all others do.

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:18:45AM -0600, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > I respect that decision and will proceed with the standard application > process, proper signatures and all. :) Thanks, I just wanted to be sure that we atleast vote about your re-application and it's nice btw that

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

chris.rebisc...@archlinux.org> wrote: Well, you could at least starting signing your mails with the next email, even if it is a new GPG key. It's something that we expect from TU-Applicants.. and I see no reason why you should excluded from this expectation. That maybe sounds a little bit harsh,

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

2018. 02. 12, 03.52, Brad Fanella via aur-general ezt írta: > Yes I do. I've just gone ahead and updated my bug tracker account to > reflect this, thank you. Thanks! :) Then I think the next step is to create a new account on AUR, add your PGP fingerprint to your aurweb profile, and post a PGP-

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:52:04AM -0600, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > Frankly I'm not quite sure what that would prove. If I don't have a known > signature on record, signing these emails doesn't do anything to verify my > identity. To imply that I'm "ignoring requests" is a bit

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

Do you still have access to your bug tracker account? Can you update your email address here? https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/7923 Yes I do. I've just gone ahead and updated my bug tracker account to reflect this, thank you. wrote: [...] is not able to sign his

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:03:32AM -0600, Brad Fanella via aur-general wrote: > > It's been around in some incarnation since 2007, and you have a > > filled-in profile at > > https://www.archlinux.org/people/trusted-user-fellows/#bfanella > > > > So I assumed you must have at one point had access

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

2018. 02. 12, 01.28, Brad Fanella via aur-general: > I'm not sure that would clear up doubts about malicious intent. Do you still have access to your bug tracker account? Can you update your email address here? https://bugs.archlinux.org/user/7923 -- György Balló Trusted User signature.asc

Re: [aur-general] TU (re-)Application

> It's been around in some incarnation since 2007, and you have a > filled-in profile at > https://www.archlinux.org/people/trusted-user-fellows/#bfanella > > So I assumed you must have at one point had access to it, even if > it's > been long enough that you have forgotten and/or lost track --