Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread DJ Lucas (LFS)
On March 6, 2019 12:24:08 AM CST, James Knight via aur-general wrote: >Hello -- new user to AUR and hoping if anyone is willing to review a >PKGBUILD [1] definition for me. I have been reading PKGBUILD [2] and >"AUR - Submitting packages" [3] documents, which the latter document >suggests to

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread Doug Newgard via aur-general
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 23:53:10 -0700 Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > On 2019-03-06 01:24, James Knight via aur-general wrote: > >Hello -- new user to AUR and hoping if anyone is willing to review a > >PKGBUILD [1] definition for me. I have been reading PKGBUILD [2] and > >"AUR - Submitting

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread Brett Cornwall via aur-general
On 2019-03-05 23:53, Brett Cornwall wrote: url='https://releng.io/' arch=('any') license=('BSD') I don't see this license in the project. It needs to be in the project, and if it is indeed BSD licensed you need to copy the license to "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/" [1] Oops... I

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread Brett Cornwall via aur-general
On 2019-03-06 01:24, James Knight via aur-general wrote: Hello -- new user to AUR and hoping if anyone is willing to review a PKGBUILD [1] definition for me. I have been reading PKGBUILD [2] and "AUR - Submitting packages" [3] documents, which the latter document suggests to "... submit the

[aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread James Knight via aur-general
Hello -- new user to AUR and hoping if anyone is willing to review a PKGBUILD [1] definition for me. I have been reading PKGBUILD [2] and "AUR - Submitting packages" [3] documents, which the latter document suggests to "... submit the PKGBUILD to the AUR mailing list ... for public review before