On 2.6.2014 22:16, xantares 09 wrote:
Hi,
It builds with either, although zlib seems to be linked dinamically for both,
so you have to specify -lz.
For me the packages are identical, same patches, etc.
xan.
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:03:37 +0200
From: hau...@gmx.com
To:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.5.2014 21:29, Alexej Magura wrote:
This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove
it-request.
package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/
I know that the package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.5.2014 21:47, Steven Honeyman wrote:
Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is
unzip 1 file...
How does the number of files in a package relate to its usefulness?
It's there for convenience, as are many other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.5.2014 11:19, Steven Honeyman wrote:
Reading the wiki, I got the impression that AUR packages with more
than 10 votes would be considered worthy enough to move to the
Community repo. I understand that the ones with thousands of votes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7.5.2014 21:06, Steven Haigh wrote:
Has been done already: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bacula/
Flagged out-of-date (2014-04-26)
On 08/05/14 03:41, ellis kenyo wrote:
Hi Steven,
Best way is to contact the new developer and flag it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7.5.2014 21:18, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 08/05/14 05:12, Никола Вукосављевић wrote:
On 7.5.2014 21:06, Steven Haigh wrote:
Has been done already:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bacula/
Flagged out-of-date (2014-04-26)
On 08/05/14 03:41
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31.1.2014 15:34, Nowaker wrote:
Can you find an example of a 2 year old comment which is still
relevant?
Maybe all comments older than 2 years should be removed? 2 years
old comments are irrelevant regardless of user being currently
active
