On Mon 2008-11-10 12:59, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:53:13PM -0500, Loui Chang wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 06:47:32PM +0100, Angel Velásquez wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Yeah I agree there should be room for some exceptions. Dependencies
> > would be the obvious exceptions, a
On Mon 2008-11-10 07:07, w9ya wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi TUs,
> >
> > Following this post on the forums (
> > http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=447186), I would like to remind
> > people that it is good etiquette to let the maint
On Fri 2008-10-31 19:45, Imanol Celaya wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Aaron Hussein Griffin <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I just got the email below and want to take this opportunity to point
> > a few things out:
> >
> > Licenses are important. If a project has
On Thu 2008-09-18 11:50, bardo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Alessio Bolognino
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While on topic, is anybody going to ESC[1] ?
> > 19-21 September, San Donà di Piave (Venice)
>
> I am. I'll see you tomorrow evening, the
On Thu 2008-09-18 11:25, bardo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:35 PM, DaNiMoTh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's with a lot of sadness that I say "bye!" to archlinux.
>
> Thanks for all your great work... maybe I'll see you around at some
> random event around Italy =) Good luck with your li
On Thu 2008-07-31 01:49, rabyte wrote:
> I'd hereby like to request the orphaning of all packages uploaded
> by funkyou. There's two packages flagged as outdated, He doesn't
> respond to comments and I tried to contact him via Jabber to no avail.
Isn't funkyou a dev of kdemod? When did you try to
On Mon 2008-07-21 18:08, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > I'm updating and fixing some things on IRC today, so I'm looking for a
> > list of IRC usernames for those of you who need new cloaks.
> > New developers, new
On Tue 2008-07-15 21:09, bardo wrote:
> Hi fellow TUs, devs and archers!
> I'm writing this long e-mail to discuss the current situation about
> sancho-gtk, a [community] package I'm maintaining.
>
> I inherited sancho-gtk, a front-end for mldonkey, when mOLOk resigned
> from his TU position, and
anka, do you realize you just sent an empty email?
I ask because this is not the first time you did it, maybe your client
has something wrong...
--
Alessio (molok) Bolognino
Please send personal email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpibOujYoyGu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed 2008-07-02 00:57, Kristaps Esterlinsh wrote:
> Hi, please remove http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xcursor-industrial/ from
> filesystem as it is orphaned (I was the maintainer), within the few days
> I'll upload it again ;) Thanks
What's the point in removing it so? If you upload a new ver
On Sat 2008-06-21 20:53, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote:
> 2008/6/21 Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > What exactly does this permission include? Is it only a permission for you
> > or
> > is the whole Arch Linux project including all mirrors, devs and tus are
> > allowed to distribute it?
On Sat 2008-06-21 16:22, Ronald van Haren wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Ronald van Haren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and just a day later, the list has become:
>
> [...]
> community x11 lxtask
> [...]
IIRC gcarrier is handling lxde stuff.
--
Alessio (molok) Bolognino
Please send
On Fri 2008-06-20 04:38, Alessio 'molok' Bolognino wrote:
> [...]
> Why don't use stop using GNOME instead and complain on their mailing
Eerr.. "Why don't YOU stop..."
--
Alessio (molok) Bolognino
Please send personal email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op
On Thu 2008-06-19 20:14, Neil Darlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have orphaned my unsupported packages as I will no longer be using Arch.
>
> I don't agree with Arch's reluctance to fix bugs which they consider
> upstream. I recently installed Mandriva on one of my systems and was
> amazed to see all th
On Thu 2008-06-05 20:20, Ronald van Haren wrote:
> on a sidenote, I really don't see any point in having these
> categories. The categories are really not intuitive and don't help
> searching for a kind of package any easier.
> Well, it may be just me of course :p
I don't think they are extremely
On Tue 2008-06-03 01:08, Sebastian Nowicki wrote:
> On 02/06/2008, at 3:43 PM, Loui wrote:
>> - try to avoid custom variables (_pkgdata). It is not needed and it
>> only appears once.
>
> Is that really such a bad thing? I just want to make it clear, since I've
> been a bit confused about it for
On Tue 2008-05-20 23:01, Bráulio Barros de Oliveira wrote:
> ok, done
I don't want to nitpick, but it would be better to avoid the useless
variables: _pkgfqn, now renamed _qt, it's used only twice, furthermore
AUR doesn't play well when custom variables are used in the source
array. This is the id
On Tue 2008-05-20 22:11, Bráulio Barros de Oliveira wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a new package to qtjambi and I would like to publish it. Apparently
> there is a user who is owning it and it is not responding my emails. Also,
> I've talked to the creator of the package.
> Anyone could please orp
On Wed 2008-05-07 02:50 , Geoffroy Carrier wrote:
> On 5/6/08, Dennis Craven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Okay, it seems nobody is dead against them. I just didn't want to
> > break some policy that I wasn't aware of. I've uploaded my latest
> > package including the ChangeLog. We'll see if any
On Wed 2008-05-07 00:42 , Geoffroy Carrier wrote:
> On 5/6/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I can only imagine the situation that the upstream build system may
> > require unzip
> > and the package maintainer rejects tweaking of th makefile or whatever
> > there is.
> sed
On Tue 2008-05-06 12:49 , Mike Ressler wrote:
> The python-pyfits package is listed as an orphan and has been flagged
> as out of date. Bringing it up to date is relatively trivial - anyone
> mind if I have a go at it? It is useful to me and I don't want to see
> it die.
>
> By way if introduction
On Tue 2008-05-06 14:54 , Anders Bergh wrote:
> I just now saw two packages in the recent updates box on the AUR front
> page with screwed up version numbers:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16828
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16829
>
> I don't really know if this causes
On Sat 2008-05-03 22:19 , Mikko Seppälä wrote:
> [...]
> Btw OT but I was the one who added dpkg (along with po4a), mainly used
> dpkg-deb from it to play with deb packages.
>
> Still should have old PKGBUILDs lying around if you want :p
Protip:
wget http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dpkg/dpkg.ta
On Fri 2008-05-02 12:08 , Eric Belanger wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
>
>> Luká Jirkovský wrote:
>>> But in other way, packages without arch field are usually very, very old.
>>>
>> Then they probably fall in this category of the suggest removal guidelines
>> - outdated and orphan
24 matches
Mail list logo
